House approves $5 million for state fair victims

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's House of Representatives is advancing a plan to give an additional $5 million to victims of last year's stage collapse at the Indiana State Fair.

The measure would help pay medical costs incurred by the 58 stage collapse victims who filed claims with the state. It would also give another $400,000 to each family of the seven people killed when winds toppled the stage just before an Aug. 13 concert by country duo Sugarland.

The House voted 96-2 for the measure. It now moves to the Senate.

House Ways and Means Chairman Jeff Espich, R-Uniondale, said Tuesday that no amount of money will right everything for the victims. But he said the additional $5 million is a start.

"I will not tell you that this is going to make everything right," he said.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller and Kenneth Feinberg, a national victim claims expert who distributed relief money to victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and other tragedies, divided the money from the state's $5 million claims fund among victims in December.

But many leaders, including Gov. Mitch Daniels who asked for the additional money in his 2012 legislative package, said the state's $5 million limit would not be enough for victims.

Rep. Ed DeLaney, D-Indianapolis, tried to amend the measure Monday to raise the limit to $22 million, but was unsuccessful. He said his figure accounted for inflation since lawmakers set the $5 million cap on payouts in 1974.

The measure would also give $80 million to school systems to cover the cost of full-day kindergarten. Debate over the money comes after the Daniels administration discovered $320 million had been left untouched in a state account.


  • what the ...?
    So - they don't want to change the cap, but just provide extra money for this one instance??? And doesn't the state constitution prohibit "special legislation"? what the heck is this, then? Raise the cap to protect future victims, not just this one, well publicized group. Espich needs to GO!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.