IBJNews

House panel backs GOP redistricting plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republican-drawn maps for new Indiana House and congressional districts advanced to the full House on Friday despite arguments from Democrats that they are aimed at ensuring GOP election dominance.

The House elections committee voted 8-5 along party lines in favor of the proposals after Republicans revised the lines for several scattered state House districts from what they had proposed Monday.

Democrats said the proposed districts will reduce the number of closely contested House districts and that some appear drawn specifically to help Republican candidates who lost elections last year.

Republicans maintain that the districts were drawn without regard to political considerations but with the goal of compactness and keeping cities and counties together.

Committee Chairman Eric Koch, R-Bedford, said the Republican proposal was made up of commonsense districts that better represented the state than those approved in 2001 when Democrats controlled the House.

"They make far more sense in terms of good government and effective organization than the maps adopted 10 years ago," Koch said.

Democrats maintain that the Republican proposal leaves 14 districts closely divided politically for the 100 House seats — down from the current 24 — and that 10 districts drawn without incumbents are heavily Republican.

"I haven't heard anyone say we're wrong," said Rep. Ed DeLaney, D-Indianapolis.

The drawing of new congressional and legislative districts, which would take effect with the 2012 elections, is done every 10 years based on new census information.

DeLaney mocked Republican leaders for saying that they didn't know how slanted the new districts would be in their favor.

"Are you going to say the prospect of 62 predominantly Republican districts just fell out of the sky?" DeLaney said. "I don't think any citizen believes that."

Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma said any political benefit his party gains from redistricting comes from population growth in predominantly Republican areas and population losses in Democratic-leaning cities.

"You don't have to be a demographer or political science major to know that you're going to see that kind of result with change in the map," Bosma said.

Democrats asked that the legislative redistricting plan be presented at public hearings around the state and then voted on in November, when the legislators convene their annual organization day. But Republicans expect the House to vote next week on the redistricting plans and for them to receive final approval before the Legislature's April 29 deadline to adjourn.

The House committee also advanced the GOP proposal for the state's nine congressional districts. Republicans now hold six of those seats and the redistricting plan puts more Republican areas into the northern Indiana district of Democrat Joe Donnelly, who narrowly won re-election last year.

Rep. Phil GiaQuinta, D-Fort Wayne, said he believed having more competitive districts would be better for the state because it would lead to fewer entrenched incumbents

"You're going to have fewer people willing to run when they have about no chance to win," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • seriously
    the way they were. any questions
  • Because....
    Ladyjan,

    The Constitution and the Supreme Court requires them to redo the districts following the census. They couldn't leave things as they were.
  • Because....
    Ladyjan,

    The Constitution and the Supreme Court requires them to redo the districts following the census. They couldn't leave things as they were.
  • why change
    What was wrong with the district the way they was. The Republicans won the house and senate anyway. Why stack the deck. Oh I know they want to sew up the state for there own well beings. Stacking the deck is not right. I hope it fall though and make the Republican look stupid.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

    2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

    3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

    4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

    5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?

    ADVERTISEMENT