House pursues 'Arkansas model' on health coverage

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana could expand health insurance coverage for low-income Hoosiers entirely through private health insurance plans under an amendment adopted by a House committee on Monday.

The approach, known as the Arkansas model, would divert federal and state funds originally earmarked for a Medicaid expansion to instead give subsidies—or “premium assistance”—to help low-income Hoosiers buy health insurance via a federally run online marketplace known as an excahnge.

But the Republican-sponsored amendment brought immediate criticism from other Republicans, including representatives of Gov. Mike Pence’s administration.

President Obama’s administration approved the Arkansas model in February and, since then, several other states have expressed interest in it. Those states include Florida, Ohio, Tennessee and Texas.

The amendment to Senate Bill 551, adopted by the House Public Health Committee on Monday, would open a second avenue by which Indiana could expand coverage to Hoosiers with incomes below the federal poverty limit.

Until now, Pence and the Republican-dominated Legislature have insisted on expanding Medicaid only by using the Health Indiana Plan. That plan relies on health savings accounts and some patient contributions to offer health insurance coverage to about 40,000 working Hoosiers with low incomes.

Pence, a Republican, wants to use the HIP program, or something very similar to it, to expand coverage to more than 400,000 Hoosiers with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty limit, which is about $32,000 for a family of four.

Senate Bill 551 gives the Pence administration the green light to do just that. But so far the Obama administration has been cool to that idea, which has caused some Democratic lawmakers to accuse Pence of jeopardizing more than $10 billion in new federal funding.

In response, House lawmakers decided to add the Arkansas model as one more option for an Indiana expansion of health insurance to low-income Hoosiers. The amended bill passed by a vote of 8-5, with a mix of Republicans and Democrats on both sides of the tally.

“This would also be additional flexibility to add a premium support model,” said Rep. Ed Clere, R-New Albany, chairman of the House Public Health Committee, in describing the amendment.

But that’s not how Sen. Pat Miller, R-Indianapolis, the author of Senate Bill 551, saw the amendment.

“I have a number of reservations about the amendment and at this point, do not support it,” Miller said Monday morning. Speaking of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, the state agency that oversees the Medicaid program, she added, “My concern is that this amendment has limited some of our negotiating ability” with the federal government.

Also, Pat Casanova, director of Indiana's Office of Medicaid Policy & Planning, criticized the amendment for limiting Indiana’s ability to negotiate with and potentially withdraw from a Medicaid expansion deal with the Obama administration. She said the Pence administration already has the authority to negotiate a deal on Medicaid expansion with the federal government, yet the porvisions of the amendment may place new limits on that power.

“We do have concerns with this amendment and how it limits our ability to withdraw from a waiver or whatever program we would negotiate with the federal government, based only on the federal government’s ability to fund it, rather than whatever other requirements they would place on us,” Casanova said.

Clere disagreed that the amendment would limit the state’s negotiating options with the federal government.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.