IBJNews

Humane Society eyes city for $3M clinic

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Humane Society of Indianapolis is shopping for donors to support construction of a $3 million spay/neuter clinic in the Fountain Square area.

Humane Society Executive Director John Aleshire said this morning that he’s negotiating for an undisclosed site in the Fountain Square area, which he hopes to reserve until he can raise $700,000 to $800,000 to get the clinic up and running.

The hoped-for clinic is a significant departure from Aleshire’s original plan to add spay/neuter services at the group’s Michigan Road headquarters.

The Humane Society hired Aleshire last August to dig the organization out of a financial hole while also improving relations with the animal-welfare community. One of his first stated goals was to add low-cost spay/neuter services by early this year.

“We can’t do this until the donors show up,” Aleshire said.

Aleshire is billing the clinic as an “Animal Resource Center,” where local groups, including Indy Feral, Indy Pit Crew and Friends of Indianapolis Dogs Outside, would have office space. The building would include a room for community use and sell pet supplies.

The Humane Society’s quest for a location just southeast of downtown sets up the possibility for competition with the city’s only existing low-cost spay/neuter clinic, the Foundation Against Companion-Animal Euthanasia, or FACE, which is on the east end of Massachusetts Avenue.

“I find that a little awkward,” said Ellen Robinson, executive director of FACE. “If you’re looking at a part of town where there’s nothing, it would be west of Indianapolis.”

Since FACE opened in 1999, the number of animals euthanized by Indianapolis Animal Care and Control and the Humane Society has dropped from 22,000 to 12,000 in 2008.

The Humane Society is telling donors that Fountain Square is ideal for a spay/neuter clinic. According to its statistics, 72 percent of local shelter animals originate from 10 zip codes, most of which are southeast and southwest of the city.

“There’s no question Fountain Square has a big problem with stray cats and dogs,” Robinson said.

The Humane Society is also taking a different philosophical approach to low-cost spay/neuter services. Because cats can bear litters at a very young age, Aleshire wants the new clinic to operate on juvenile cats and dogs – animals as young as six weeks old that weigh as little as 2 pounds.

FACE operates only on animals that are at least four months old or weigh 4 pounds. Robinson acknowledged that juvenile spay/neuter is becoming more popular with animal-welfare advocates, but said FACE takes a conservative approach. “I don’t know that there have been long-term studies to see how it affects the patients,” she said.

The Humane Society is likely to base its fees on a sliding scale and pet owners would have to prove that they qualify for low-income services.

Robinson said FACE has always used a low flat fee in order to avoid discouraging participation. The clinic spays or neuters cats for $20 and neuters all dogs for $30. Sterilization of medium and large female dogs costs $30, while the fee for small female dogs is $50.

FACE employs seven veterinarians, including three surgeons, and performs an average of 73 surgeries a day.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT