IBJNews

Hungarian court's decision favors Emmis

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Hungarian court on Tuesday ruled in favor of Emmis Communications Corp. in its bid to get a popular radio station it operates in Hungary back on the air.

Hungarian officials took Slager Radio, the national radio station operated by Indianapolis-based Emmis, off the air in November and awarded the license to one of the country’s political parties.

But the court said the country’s National Radio and Television board illegally awarded the contract, meaning Slager submitted one of just two qualifying bids to operate Hungary’s two national radio licenses.

The other was submitted by Danubius Radio, which the same court ruled in favor of earlier this month after the station also lost its bid to renew its broadcasting rights.

“We feel vindicated that the courts struck down the regulatory decision, and ruled in favor for our claims,” Emmis Chairman and CEO Jeff Smulyan said in a prepared statement. “The people of Hungary believed in Slager, and we trust we’ll be back on the air soon.”

Emmis won the broadcasting license for Slager Radio in 1997. It was consistently the top-rated radio station in Hungary, reaching 3.5 million listeners per week in a country with a population of 10 million, the company said.

The decision by the country's board to award the operating license to a Hungarian political party has brought “enormous” international pressure on the government to reverse the decision, Emmis said.

In a resolution passed Dec. 8, the U.S. House of Representatives condemned the actions and “encouraged” the Hungarian government to “respect the rule of law and treat foreign investors fairly.”

Slager brought in revenue of $23.9 million in the fiscal year ended Feb. 28, 2008, Emmis said, and $6.4 million in the six months ended Aug. 31, 2009.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT