IBJNews

Hurdles remain for Roche Diagnostics on HPV test

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Roche Diagnostics Corp. could enjoy a huge increase in sales of its HPV tests if all doctors and women follow a recommendation issued last week by an advisory committee at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The committee unanimously recommended that Roche’s HPV test replace Pap smears as the standard way to screen women for cervical cancer. The FDA does not have to follow the recommendations of its advisory committees, but it usually does.

Still, wrinkles in the U.S. health care system present several high hurdles before Roche can turn that recommendation into reality—and claim the substantial commercial success it could bring.

Physicians ordered 31.8 million Pap smears in 2010, the most recent year for which data are available from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. By comparison, doctors ordered just 4.2 million HPV tests that year.

HPV stands for human papillomavirus, which causes 99 percent of the 12,000 annual cases of cervical cancer in the United States. Roche’s HPV test can detect the presence of the two most dangerous strains of HPV—genotypes 16 and 18—which are responsible for 70 percent of cervical cancer cases.

If Roche, which operates its laboratory testing business out of Indianapolis, could get more women not receiving Pap smears to instead use its test, that would not only generate a steady stream of revenue, but even more important, it would help it sell more of its pricey testing machines to hospitals and doctors.

As of 2011, those machines, called the cobas 4800, cost $250,000 to $300,000.

Roche first won FDA approval for its HPV test in 2011. In a 47,000-patient clinical trial, Roche found that one in seven women who had a normal Pap smear result actually had the presence of HPV’s strain 16.

“Through technological and scientific advancement, we now have a better screening tool for cervical cancer. Women around the world deserve the best tool to know their risk and reduce their chances of developing cervical cancer,” said Roland Diggelmann, chief operating officer of Roche Diagnostics, in a prepared statement.

But while the FDA advisers were convinced, it will take longer before physician groups agree to change their practice, Dr. David Chelmow, who led development of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' screening guidelines, told the Reuters news service.

“It will take some time for the ACS (American Cancer Society), the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other big groups to get a chance to look at the data," Chernow said. "There is little comparative effectiveness data comparing primary HPV screening with co-testing."

Dr. Vijay Kumar, an analyst for ISI Group, said in a research note that convincing doctors to use the Roche test as their only tool "will be a huge task, and you will need a head-to-head trial versus Pap testing before doctors even begin to be convinced."

Another barrier to change, according to Kumar, is the fact that pathologists make money on Pap tests and referrals, while with HPV tests, the test provider makes the bulk of the profit.

Roche has been having success in its professional and molecular diagnostic divisions. Those two units combined in 2013 to produce North American revenue of 1.7 billion Swiss francs, or $1.6 billion, up 6 percent over the previous year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Hiking blocks to an office after fighting traffic is not logical. Having office buildings around the loop, 465 and in cities in surrounding counties is logical. In other words, counties around Indianapolis need office buildings like Keystone, Meridian, Michigan Road/College Park and then no need to go downtown. Financial, legal, professional businesses don't need the downtown when Carmel, Fishers, North Indy are building their own central office buildings close to the professionals. The more Hamilton, Boone county attract professionals, the less downtown is relevant. Highrises have no meaning if they don't have adequate parking for professionals and clients. Great for show, but not exactly downtown Chicago, no lakefront, no river to speak of, and no view from highrises of lake Michigan and the magnificent mile. Indianapolis has no view.

  2. "The car count, THE SERIES, THE RACING, THE RATINGS, THE ATTENDANCE< AND THE MANAGEMENT, EVERY season is sub-par." ______________ You're welcome!

  3. that it actually looked a lot like Sato v Franchitti @Houston. And judging from Dario's marble mouthed presentation providing "color", I'd say that he still suffers from his Dallara inflicted head injury._______Considering that the Formula E cars weren't going that quickly at that exact moment, that was impressive air time. But I guess we shouldn't be surprised, as Dallara is the only car builder that needs an FAA certification for their cars. But flying Dallaras aren't new. Just ask Dan Wheldon.

  4. Does anyone know how and where I can get involved and included?

  5. While the data supporting the success of educating our preschoolers is significant, the method of reaching this age group should be multi-faceted. Getting business involved in support of early childhood education is needed. But the ways for businesses to be involved are not just giving money to programs and services. Corporations and businesses educating their own workforce in the importance of sending a child to kindergarten prepared to learn is an alternative way that needs to be addressed. Helping parents prepare their children for school and be involved is a proven method for success. However, many parents are not sure how to help their children. The public is often led to think that preschool education happens only in schools, daycare, or learning centers but parents and other family members along with pediatricians, librarians, museums, etc. are valuable resources in educating our youngsters. When parents are informed through work lunch hour workshops in educating a young child, website exposure to exceptional teaching ideas that illustrate how to encourage learning for fun, media input, and directed community focus on early childhood that is when a difference will be seen. As a society we all need to look outside the normal paths of educating and reaching preschoolers. It is when methods of involving the most important adult in a child's life - a parent, that real success in educating our future workers will occur. The website www.ifnotyouwho.org is free and illustrates activities that are research-based, easy to follow and fun! Businesses should be encouraging their workers to tackle this issue and this website makes it easy for parents to be involved. The focus of preschool education should be to inspire all the adults in a preschooler's life to be aware of what they can do to prepare a child for their future life. Fortunately we now know best practices to prepare a child for a successful start to school. Is the business community ready to be involved in educating preschoolers when it becomes more than a donation but a challenge to their own workers?

ADVERTISEMENT