IBJNews

Indiana board considers 1-year delay of patient tests

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's Medical Licensing Board is considering delaying for one year a proposed new rule that would require physicians to conduct annual toxicology tests on some patients as part of a larger state effort to crack down on prescription drug abuse.

Board members on Thursday discussed the pros and cons of making the drug-testing requirement a recommendation for the first year before it would become mandatory in 2015.

Some board members said they were concerned that physicians might need the extra time to adjust to the proposed emergency rules the panel must adopt as part of a state law passed this year calling for standards for prescribing potent medications such as painkillers.

"The market needs to know what we are going to require as part of this testing," said board member Bharat Barai, a physician in the northern Indiana city of Merrillville.

Board Chairman Stephen Huddleston questioned whether delaying the proposed mandatory urine or saliva tests for some patients to detect potent painkillers would satisfy the Legislature's instructions that the panel draft emergency rules to help curtail rampant prescription drug abuse.

Prescription drugs were blamed for 718 overdose deaths in Indiana in 2011, a nearly 10-percent increase from 2010's 654 deaths.

The results of the drug tests would determine if a patient is actually taking their prescribed medications or possibly selling them illegally to people hooked on those drugs.

"That was a big piece of the Legislature's concerns, that we have people out there selling this stuff," Huddleston told the board. "We've had dramatic testimony from a nurse who watched the patient go into the parking lot to sell the drugs he'd just gotten. And then he came back the next month and the physician gave him another prescription."

Board member John McGoff, an Indianapolis physician, said doctors who've already adopted best practices for spotting patients who might be selling their medications already perform periodic tests on patients and wouldn't be affected by the new rules.

"They aren't going to see a change. They've worked it out and it's part of their overhead," he said.

Huddleston said the panel, which also discussed other issues Thursday related to the proposed rules, would hold a public hearing in September on those rules and likely vote during its October meeting on adopting them.

The state law passed earlier this year requires the board to adopt temporary emergency rules by Nov. 1, and have permanent ones in place by November 2014.

State Attorney General Greg Zoeller said last week that more people in Indiana now abuse prescription drugs than abuse cocaine, heroin, hallucinogens and inhalants combined.

The new rules will be part of a state prescription drug crackdown that's also targeting so-called "pill mills," where doctors churn out prescriptions to addicted patients.

Zoeller said his office has taken action against more than 15 doctors since January 2012 for prescribing addictive painkillers for purposes not considered medically appropriate.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Freedom is Good
    Mandatory testing of precious bodily fluids is an important and vital component of personal freedom. Also, it's better than asking dangerous questions like why some people are so unhappy that they are willing to risk injury, imprisonment, or death to escape from their miserable lives for a few hours. Those folks need to accept that they are losers and should be made to face their fate rather than avoiding it. All spoils to the victors and none to the losers - there is no greater moral imperative. All else is theft.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT