IBJNews

Indiana budget chief orders another 5 percent in cuts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State agencies — including those that run prisons, protect children and maintain highways — must cut their spending by another 5 percent during the fiscal year that begins July 1 after already chopping 10 percent a few months ago.

Gov. Mitch Daniels' budget director, Christopher Ruhl, sent a memo to all state agencies Wednesday directing them to hold back 2011 fiscal year spending by 15 percent from the amount approved by lawmakers last year.

It will mark the third time in less than a year that they've had to tighten their belts because state tax collections and other revenues have repeatedly fallen short of projections. Daniels last November ordered most agencies to cut 2010 spending by 10 percent, then said schools and colleges had to pare a combined $450 million.

"For most agencies, this reduction is on top of reductions contained in the budget adopted by the General Assembly for the current biennium last June," Ruhl said in the memo, obtained Thursday by The Associated Press.

The memo's contents were first reported by television station WRTV late Wednesday.

Ruhl's directive applies only to executive branch agencies, but Ruhl has asked other elected officials, the courts and the Legislature to also cut their spending. Early indications were that most would try to comply.

"We will continue to look for efficiencies and ways to save," Lauren Auld, a spokeswoman for Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett, said in an e-mail message.

"I'm certain we will do what is needed," Scott Minier, a spokesman for state Senate Republicans, said in a statement.

There was no immediate reaction Thursday from Democratic House Speaker Patrick Bauer of South Bend.

Outside state government, one advocate suggested targeted budget cuts that spare essential services could work better than across-the-board reductions. The Indiana Association of United Ways has encouraged local affiliates facing their own revenue shortfalls "to think strategically about their priorities," said Lucinda Nord, the group's vice president for public policy.

Ruhl said that through March 31, or the first nine months of the current state fiscal year, state revenues have come in $867 million below projections, a 9.4 percent shortfall that comes on the heels of a 7.4 percent gap a year ago.

The most recent state revenue forecast shows 2011 fiscal year collections coming in lower than they were as far back as 2006, before the national economic downturn, Ruhl said. If spending levels remained constant without a state tax increase, the state would deplete its current reserves within 14 months and begin the 2012 fiscal year with a deficit.

Austerity moves by various agencies already have included layoffs, pay freezes, cuts in services and postponed building projects. For example, highway crews have shuttered rest stops, some medical providers have received lower Medicaid payments for treating poor patients, and child welfare officials have trimmed a counseling program aimed at preventing abuse and neglect.

Agency spokesmen reached Thursday indicated the spending cuts will continue. Doug Garrison, a Department of Correction spokesman, said the agency was "in the process of examining all facets of our budget."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I will wear Depends
    Thanks for the information about the rest stops being closed. I previous years when I have traveled through Indiana on my way to visit my relatives in Ohio I have stayed at South Bend and visited other places. This year with the rest stops closed I will wear Depends and go through Indiana as fast as I legally can.
  • Not So Quick and Easy
    Cutting the Governor and Legislators pay by 30% would save a few hundred thousand dollars. The governor makes $95,000 and hasn't accepted raises when provided. This is an $800 million problem that needs job creation and economic growth to provide the state with the revenues it needs to not have to keep cutting costs.
  • Quick and easy fix
    The governor and the legislature both need to cut their saleries by 30% immediately. Then this issue will be resolved almost as quick. As long as it is kids in schools, the elderly, the sick, kids in need of services etc. that are effected, this issue will never be resolved. The GOP both in Washington and in Indiana created the mess that caused this, but their wages have not been touched like everyone elses.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT