IBJNews

'Indiana Experience' boosts Historical Society visits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Historical Society's new interactive exhibit, "Indiana Experience," has attracted 5,007 visitors in the seven weeks since its March 20 opening, society officials announced Wednesday morning.

The society said the attendance represents a 57.4-percent increase over typical walk-in traffic to the Indiana History Center. The figure includes members who requested a wristband to visit the exhibit and visitors who purchased tickets, which are sold on a walk-up basis at the center at 450 W. Ohio St. in Indianapolis.

Ticket prices for the exhibit range from $5 to $7, but children under 5 and society members are admitted free. 

Indiana Experience and a recent remodeling of the building are part of an effort to draw more foot traffic to the center on downtown's canal.

"The IHS continues to make strides in connecting both Hoosiers and out-of-state visitors to our state's past, and the 'Indiana Experience' is a primary vehicle for that," John Herbst, the society's president and CEO said in a prepared statement. "We are looking forward to the beginning of the summer tourism season and even more opportunities to share these new, innovative and exciting programs."

The society also reported a 30-percent increase in traffic to the center's William Henry Smith Memorial Library since March 20. It has received 931 visitors since Indiana Experience opened.

The society also reported significantly higher sales at the Basile History Market gift shop and the Stardust Cafe.

IBJ recently published a video tour of the Indiana Experience.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT