Indiana House leader expects school spending boost

Associated Press
January 17, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The leader of the Indiana House said Thursday that his chamber's budget likely will boost education spending more than proposed by Gov. Mike Pence and that lawmakers might skip the GOP governor's planned tax cuts to do it.

Republican Speaker Brian Bosma said he believed the Legislature should try to restore more of the $300 million that was cut from public school funding in recent years because of the recession. Bosma also remained skeptical of lawmakers approving the 10-percent cut in the state's personal income tax rate that fellow Republican Pence highlighted during last year's gubernatorial campaign and included in his budget plan.

Pence's budget proposal calls for a 1-percent increase in school funding each year of the two-year state budget. That would add about $65 million a year to school funding.

"It may be difficult to invest in all the critical needs that we have before us and still accept the governor's tax-cut proposal," Bosma said. "That doesn't mean it's off the table."

The House Ways and Means Committee is now conducting budget hearings and is expected by late February to advance a spending plan to the full House. The Legislature has until late April to adopt a budget bill.

Pence's $29 billion, two-year budget increases total spending by about $200 million each year, or roughly 1.4 percent, while building the state's cash reserves. It also plans for a $790 million cut in the state's personal income tax by reducing the rate from 3.4 percent to 3.06 percent.

Then-Gov. Mitch Daniels ordered the school funding cuts as he scaled back state spending after tax revenues declined during the recession.

Bosma said restoring more of that education funding would be a priority.

"We were around for the cuts in that regard, so we indicated we would seek to strategically restore those where we could," Bosma said.

Pence did not say Thursday whether he would accept a modified tax cut or consider additional spending for areas like education.

"We were very grateful to present a recommended budget," Pence said. "We intend to take that budget proposal to every member of the General Assembly, and, more importantly, to the people of Indiana."

Bosma said he also expected more money would go toward higher education than the 1-percent increase proposed by Pence.

Finding additional money for state and local road projects will also be a priority as funding dries up from the $3.8 billion lease of the Indiana Toll Road that Daniels approved in 2006.

"You can't be the Crossroads of America — and attempt to sell yourself as the Crossroads of America — without adequate roads and bridges and other transportation infrastructure," Bosma said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.