Indiana insurers must make best guesses on 2015 price hikes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Health insurers such as WellPoint Inc. that plan to hike prices on their Obamacare policies more than 10 percent in 2015 will have a much harder time than usual making their case to regulators.

That’s because the tumultuous and back-loaded enrollment process for the Obamacare exchanges gives them far, far less information about their new customers than usual.

Insurers in Indiana must file their 2015 rates by mid-May—which is just two weeks after the last of their new exchange customers start coverage on their new plans.

That’s nowhere near enough time for insurers to get the information they need to predict claims for 2015. And because of lag time for processing medical claims, insurers will have incomplete data even for customers that started coverage on Jan. 1.

“It is a concern,” said Karl Knable, health actuary at the Indiana Department of Insurance, who will lead Indiana’s review of health insurance rates for 2015. “None of the experience that they’ll have at the time that they file 2015 rates will be what we call ‘credible experience.’”

So instead, insurers are piecing together the information they do have to make educated guesses about the premiums they’ll need to cover claims in 2015. Joe Swedish, CEO of Indianapolis-based WellPoint, predicted in March that there will be “double-digit” premium increases.

One route insurers can take, Knable said, is to start with the assumptions they made heading into 2014 and then make a case why those assumptions need to be adjusted for 2015.

That’s what Indianapolis-based MDwise Inc. will need to do, since MDwise had no individual health insurance customers before 2014.

However, industry veteran WellPoint will build its 2015 rate filing by starting with medical claims filed in 2013, similar to what it did last year when preparing its rates for this year.

“We took 2012 claims experience to develop projected claims cost, adjusting for items such as change in morbidity of the population” and benefit changes that were necessary to comply with the Affordable Care Act, wrote Tony Felts, a spokesman for WellPoint’s Indianapolis-based subsidiary, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, in an email.

Morbidity is medical jargon for the prevalence of sickness in a group of patients. Yet insurers will have very little information about the sickness levels in their individual insurance policies this year.

That’s because Obamacare did not allow insurers to ask for or adjust their price based on customers’ medical histories, as insurers had typically done before.
But insurers will use demographic information—age, smoking habits, household income and geography—to adjust their expectations for medical claims this year.

They also might get some signals from the small number of medical and pharmacy claims they do have from 2014. Pharmacy claims are typically processed more quickly than bills from doctors and hospitals.

“I’m sure every insurer is using as many resources as they can,” said Paul Houchens, a consulting actuary in the Indianapolis health practice of Seattle-based Milliman Inc.

In addition to Anthem and MDwise, the two other insurers that sold Obamacare exchange policies this year were Fort Wayne-based Physicians Health Plan of Northern Indiana Inc. and St. Louis-based Centene Corp.

Insurers will also have to factor in other moving parts of Obamacare in their 2015 prices.

A reinsurance program that is part of Obamacare—which in 2014 covers 80 percent of medical claims that fall between $45,000 and $250,000—allowed insurers to reduce their rates about 10 percent this year, Knable said.

But that reinsurance gets less generous in 2015, which will shave about 2 percentage points off those savings, Knable estimated.

In addition, exchange enrollment, which in Indiana was on pace to top 85,000 in early March, is expected to double in 2015 as Obamacare’s tax for not buying coverage shoots up to $395 per adult, or 2 percent of household income.

However, Indiana will go along with an Obama administration decision to allow individuals and small businesses to keep renewing their pre-Obamacare policies until 2016. That could keep larger numbers of healthy people out of the exchanges for longer than anticipated—because their pre-Obamacare policies will cost them less than an Obamacare policy would.

That could yield a higher proportion of unhealthy patients, and therefore higher premiums, in the exchanges.

“This first year or two, we might see a lot higher claims,” Knable said. “I would not expect the increase to be less than what we’ve seen before.”?


  • UHC
    The lack of mention of UHC is because they did not participate in the Indiana Health Exchange. We discussed this at length at http://www.indianainsurancehealth.com 2015 may be different, but it's hard to predict right now. However, UHC does have very inexpensive short-term plans which are popular for persons that missed Open Enrollment. However, it is not an ACA-compliant plan.
  • Wellpoint again?
    Why don't you ever interview/request information from Indy's Golden Rule Insurance Company, a UnitedHealthcare company selling UnitedHealthOne items? They are only the largest individual health insurance company in the country!!! I never see them mentioned when you discuss health insurance!
    • Another View on WellPoint
      If one would like another view on WellPoint and their aggressive tactics to reap billion dollar profits, read this article, http://www.publicintegrity.org/2014/04/07/14521/whats-point-wellpoint There's a luke-warm tone to the IBJ article that seems almost to endorse the Indiana approach to coddling the insurance carriers because they are actually having to "insure" people. Unfortunately, there's not much said about how state regulators could be helping strike a balance between consumers need for health care insurance and the insurance company's need to be in business. Is it just an accepted conclusion that WellPoint will need to increase their profits once again? According to the article from Public Integrity, none of the other major insurers have made double-digit predictions for increased costs.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

      2. If you only knew....

      3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

      4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

      5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.