IBJNews

Indiana mayors frustrated by FEMA aid rejection

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Some local government leaders are frustrated that the Federal Emergency Management Agency has turned down Indiana's aid request from the severe winter storm that hit the state in early January.

State officials had sought federal grants for government and certain not-for-profit organizations in 49 counties to cover storm costs.

The FEMA decision is the third time in the past year it has rejected storm aid for Kokomo, which also had severe flooding and tornado damage during 2013.

Kokomo Mayor Greg Goodnight told WTHR-TV says the city's estimated $750,000 in January storm costs will cut into planned road projects.

Mayor Dennis Tyler of Muncie told The Star Press that FEMA should be denying assistance requests from all states if Indiana doesn't qualify from the winter storm.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Absurd
    To say this is retaliation is absurd. Almost as absurd as the GOP/TP hypocrites who scream personal responsibility and limited government, unless it comes to them. What a joke...federal aid for snow removal. Absurd.
  • Dont be a Hoosier Hick
    This is not retaliation, but a learning tool for you. Tax caps sound good until YOU need services. Mitch threw a timebomb over his shoulder and just sits on the sidelines now as we bicker. And this will only get worse.
  • State Can't Have It Both Ways
    I have to laugh. This is the state headed by the party of so-called "limited government" that likes to constantly bash the federal government. Now, some Indiana cities want the federal government to pay for snow removal. I have a better idea--how about not cutting corporate taxes and personal income taxes to the point that cities cannot afford basic services?
  • Feds
    We dont need to be asking the feds for assistance. Less federal government! Next thing you know they'll be wantin our guns and snow shovels!
  • Get it right
    Let's continue to lower taxes in Indiana so we can be more competitive for federal assistance. Oh wait, Indiana leaders are against entitlement programs!
  • Political retribution
    Comrade Obama and the FEMA politburo do not appreciate states that didn't vote for them in the last "election".
    • Snow removal?
      Didn't think FEMA was for snow removal. As much snow as Indiana got, other areas received way more.
    • Isn't this called "disaster aid"?
      Aid for tornado damage? Yes. Aid to pay for plowing snow, something local governments do every year? No. What will they think of next? An application for federal aid to pay for street sweeping if the leaves fall off the tree more quickly than anticipated? Oh, that's right, we don't even do street sweeping in Indy anymore. Bring the federal aid.
    • No Soup For You...
      Indiana should have been part of Obamacare, lol. That is what this is about. Now Pence wants help and the feds are like, "No soup for you."

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

    2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

    3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

    4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

    5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

    ADVERTISEMENT