IBJNews

Indiana moves up in med tech rankings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana has the seventh-largest cluster of medical technology firms in the United States, according to a new analysis by the Lewin Group.

The industry employed 19,950 Hoosiers in 2007 and supported another 35,000 jobs in supplier companies, according to Lewin’s analysis, which was funded by AdvaMed, a Washington, D.C.-based industry trade group.

California has by far the largest medical technology industry, with 84,000 employed. The industry as a whole employs 423,000, paying wages 40-percent higher than the national average.

Medical technology includes surgical and medical tools and implants, equipment for blood and dental labs, and similar products. In Indiana, the industry includes such firms as Bloomington-based Cook Inc., Batesville-based Hill-Rom Holdings Inc., Warsaw-based Zimmer Holdings Inc. and Switzerland-based Roche Diagnostics, which has its North American headquarters in Indianapolis.

Compared with a 2005 study by the Virginia-based Lewin Group, Indiana’s medical technology employment grew 28 percent from 2005 to 2007, helping Indiana gain one spot by moving ahead of New York in medical technology employment.

Hoosiers also are the most productive among peers in major medical technology states. Indiana workers churned out $6.9 billion in shipments in 2007, or 5 percent of the $136 billion total nationwide.

California led the way with $26.3 billion in total shipments, followed by Massachusetts with $8.3 billion.

Medical technology faces an uncertain future, with the new health law promising to assess $2 billion a year on the industry, divvied up by amount of sales. Companies with consumer-focused or physician-focused products, such as Roche Diagnostics’ blood glucose monitors, will likely benefit from the 32 million new insured customers the law is predicted to create.

But medical products makers selling to hospitals—which already were required by law to treat uninsured patients—are unlikely to see a significant boost in sales.

Still, aging baby boomers are sure to keep demand for medical technology products growing for many years to come.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. We gotta stop this Senior crime. Perhaps long jail terms for these old boozers is in order. There are times these days (more rather than less) when this state makes me sick.

  2. One option is to redistribute the payroll tax already collected by the State. A greater share could be allocated to the county of the workplace location as opposed to the county of residency. Not a new tax, just re-allocate what is currently collected.

  3. Have to agree with Mal Burgess. The biggest problem is massive family breakdown in these neighborhoods. While there are a lot of similiarities, there is a MASSIVE difference between 46218 and 46219. 46219 is diluted by some stable areas, and that's probably where the officers live. Incentivizing is fine, but don't criticize officers for choosing not to live in these neighbor hoods. They have to have a break from what is arguably one of the highest stress job in the land. And you'll have to give me hard evidence that putting officers there is going to make a significant difference. Solid family units, responsible fathers, siblings with the same fathers, engaged parents, commitment to education, respect for the rule of law and the importance of work/a job. If the families and the schools (and society) will support these, THEN we can make a difference.

  4. @Agreed, when you dine in Marion County, the taxes paid on that meal go to state coffers (in the form of the normal sales taxes) and to the sports/entertainment venues operated by the CIB. The sales taxes on your clothing and supplies just go to the state. The ONLY way those purchases help out Indianapolis is through the payroll taxes paid by the (generally low-wage) hourly workers serving you.

  5. The government leaders of Carmel wouldn't last a week trying to manage Indianapolis. There's a major difference between running a suburb with virtually no one below the poverty level and running a city in which 21+% are below the poverty level. (http://www.census.gov/did/www/saipe/data/interactive/#view=StateAndCounty&utilBtn=&yLB=0&stLB=15&cLB=49&dLB=0&gLB=0&usSts_cbSelected=false&usTot_cbSelected=true&stateTot_cbSelected=true&pLB=0?ltiYearSelected=false?ltiYearAlertFlag=false?StateFlag=false?validSDYearsFlag=false)

ADVERTISEMENT