IBJNews

Indiana No. 3 in premium surge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hoosiers have more reasons than most Americans to support health care reform as action gets started in the Senate, perhaps as early as this week.

Health insurance premium increases in Indiana have risen 136 percent in the last decade, third-highest among all states.

It’s also three times higher than Hoosier wage increases, which have run a bit below average in the last 10 years. That means Indiana residents are losing more ground to rising health care costs than peers across the country.

Those numbers are from government data compiled by the White House in September. Only Alaska and Oregon have seen larger run-ups in health insurance pricing.

Despite that severe pain, both of Indiana’s senators have voiced significant reservations about health care reform. Republican Richard Lugar doesn’t support it at all. And Democrat Evan Bayh says he’s concerned about adding to the deficit.

So what gives?

Reports keep coming out that suggest the bills are unlikely to meet President Obama’s goal of reducing the cost of health care, even though they will extend health insurance coverage to millions more Americans. For one example, see economist Robert Samuelson’s take in Newsweek here.

And even left-leaning health insurance consultant Richard Eskow, blogging on Huffington Post, called the recently passed House bill “deeply flawed.” If passed into law unchanged, he predicts higher health insurance premiums for the middle class, which he predicts could alienate them from the Democratic Party. Read Eskow's blog here.

Also, industries with a major presence in Indiana—medical devices, pharmaceuticals, health insurers—have turned against health reform or at least major provisions of it. That would give any politician pause.

One other complicating factor might be the lack of polling data from Indiana. IUPUI political polling expert Brian Vargus said he knows of only one Indiana-specific survey taken about health care reform.

That one, from late October, showed Hoosiers supporting reform: 52 percent to 42 percent. But it was commissioned by pro-reform groups in an attempt to pressure Bayh, a Democrat, to vote for reform. So consider the source.

For Lugar, constituent comments have been overwhelmingly opposed to the health care bills, running at greater than 10 comments against for every comment in support. Bayh’s office did not provide a similar ratio.

Of course, constituents can repeatedly make calls and send letters, exaggerating the true prevalence of their opinion, Vargus noted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT