Indiana officials standing by Statehouse crowd limits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

State officials vigorously defended a new 3,000-person Statehouse capacity limit on Tuesday, saying it was driven by public safety concerns and not by political motives as labor unions and other opponents maintain.

The capacity limit and other tighter security policies are expected to see their first test Wednesday, with perhaps hundreds of labor union members arriving on the opening day of this year's legislative session to protest a push by majority Republicans to approve a right-to-work proposal.

The leader of the state agency that oversees the Statehouse and its grounds said that agency, the state fire marshal's office and state police decided to review the capacity question on their own after similar protests during last year's legislative session drew large, boisterous crowds.

Department of Administration Commissioner Robert Wynkoop said Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels' office wasn't told about the decision until Thursday, a day before the new policy was announced.

Wynkoop and other officials said they expected the capacity limit would rarely be reached but that it wasn't possible to keep an exact count and that there would be constant reviews of the policy.

"We are not keeping people out," Wynkoop said. "That is the furthest thing from what we're trying to do here."

The new limits will cap the number of Statehouse visitors at about 1,300 because it takes into account 1,700 people who work there or who have access passes, including about 250 lobbyists, he said.

The Indiana AFL-CIO intends to monitor whether any people aren't able to enter the Statehouse on Wednesday and is considering possible legal action to fight the limits, union spokesman Jeff Harris said.

"Citizens won't be allowed in, but lobbyists will," he said. "That's despicable."

The new policy raises questions about whether members of the public might not be able to attend committee hearings or seek to speak with their legislators in person unless they have made previous arrangements.

It is unclear how often the new limits might lead to shut offs of public access. State police Capt. David Bursten said the most visitors the Statehouse had in one day during the last legislation session was about 1,500, which would exceed the new cap by a couple hundred people.

The new security policies also prohibit visitors from bringing in cans or glass bottles, noisemakers and signs larger than 2 feet by 2 feet. Officials have also newly designated a Statehouse elevator for use only by legislators and staff members and plan greater restrictions on people gathering outside the House and Senate chambers.

State Fire Marshal James Greeson said the capacity limit is based on how quickly the building could be evacuated. He said his staff calculated that with the four exits on the main floor of the 1880s Statehouse, up to 3,200 people could get out within about five minutes.

The governor's spokeswoman said the security plan was completely developed by the safety officials.

"He trusts the agencies will do the right thing," spokeswoman Jane Jankowski said.


  • hazing and harassing an employee is unconstitutional
    indiana officials should immediately fire mitch and white . you dont haze and harass a worker at work . and you dont send students to do that either . its illegal and unconstitutional and puts an individuals safety and life in danger . both of are a disgrace and shame to any form of education . you disgust me . mitch and white should leave
  • Seriously?
    The Statehouse has stood since 1888, and this has never been an issue until now, even when there were 20,000+ protestors there several years back. It's painfully obvious this is an attempt to interfere with the citizens' rights to peaceably assemble, and petition for a governmental redress of grievances.
  • Limited Access at Statehouse
    The decision seems fair and reasonable to me. Public safety must come first, and the Statehouse was not designed for the mass infusion of protesters.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ