Indiana panel's proposal would expand net metering

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A proposed expansion of Indiana's rules dictating which owners of wind turbines and other renewable power systems get credit for excess power they generate is drawing early support from clean energy advocates.

The draft "net metering" rule would boost the state's power cap for renewable power units and expand it to all customer classes served by electric utilities.

Under net metering, customers are charged only for the net amount of power they use. They get credit on future bills for excess power generated and sent into the electric grid.

But Indiana's current rules apply only to homeowners and K-12 schools and set a 10-kilowatt limit for each customer tapping the wind, sun or other clean energy sources.

The proposal drafted by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission and released last week calls for expanding net metering to all customer classes and raising the power capacity 100-fold to 1 megawatt.

The panel agreed to revise the rules at the behest of state Sen. James Merritt, R-Indianapolis, after a push to update them failed in the Legislature's closing days this March for the second straight year.

Merritt said Tuesday he had not reviewed the proposed changes. But he said he's eager to hear the details of a technical workshop the commission will host Thursday on the draft rules.

Steve Francis of the Hoosier Chapter of the Sierra Club said the group is "very supportive" of the proposed cap expansion and extending the rule to businesses, industries and municipalities — the classes he said would benefit most from a far higher cap.

"In our view, this will expand the use of net metering significantly in Indiana, create jobs that can't be outsourced and make Indiana more competitive with other states," he said.

Commission spokeswoman Danielle McGrath said the panel decided to revise the rules after public hearings in Indianapolis, Owensville and South Bend in June showed there was support.

McGrath said the proposed rule will be published in the Indiana Register, followed by a public hearing and a vote before the commission. The timeline is unclear, but she said Indiana rule-making typically takes 10 to 12 months.

State Rep. Ryan Dvorak, who sponsored legislation last session calling for a net metering overhaul, said a draft rule is progress "but there's some room for improvement."

Dvorak, D-South Bend, said he would prefer the state had no power cap for renewable systems. He said any such limit would only end up excluding customers with systems that generate more power than the cap level.

For example, he said the city of South Bend's planned 2 megawatt hydroelectric dam on the St. Joseph River would not be eligible for net metering under the proposed changes.

"When you draw these arbitrary caps, you're going to cut some people out when the goal behind this is to develop the industry and allow everybody in," Dvorak said.

The Indiana Energy Association, which represents Indiana's largest power companies, still is getting feedback from its electric utility members to assess their position on the proposed changes, said Ed Simcox, the group's chief executive officer.

He said the association is analyzing the "technical ramifications" of the proposed 1 megawatt cap to determine what its impact might be on investor-owned electric utilities.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?