IBJNews

Indiana unemployment rate jumps to 8.9 percent

Cory Schouten
October 21, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana's unemployment rate rose for a fourth straight month in September, to a seasonally adjusted 8.9 percent, inching closer to the overall U.S. rate of 9.1 percent, the state’s Department of Workforce Development said Friday morning.

Indiana added 8,800 private-sector jobs in September, but the unemployment rate rose from the August mark of 8.7 percent as more Hoosiers returned to the labor force to look for work.

The number of unemployed Hoosiers was 266,477 in September, compared to 273,902 in August.

The state's unemployment rate has climbed from 8.2 percent in April, but is a full percentage point below the 9.9 percent it reached last September.

Employment sectors adding a significant amount of jobs were professional and business services, construction and leisure and hospitality. Employment in manufacturing and trade, as well as in transportation and utilities, showed large declines.

Indiana’s unemployment rate remains lower than its neighbors, but the gap closed somewhat in September. Ohio’s rate is 9.1 percent, Kentucky’s is 9.7 percent, Illinois’ is 10 percent and Michigan’s is 11.1 percent.

In the Indianapolis-Carmel metropolitan area, the non-seasonally adjusted jobless rate was 8.1 percent in September, down from 8.6 percent in August 2010. Comparisons of metro areas are more accurately made using the same months in prior years because the government does not adjust the figures for factory furloughs and other seasonal fluctuations.

Meanwhile, the nation's unemployment rate in September remained at 9.1 percent for the third straight month.

The number of people applying for unemployment benefits last week ticked down 1,000 to a seasonally adjusted 404,000, the Labor Department said on Oct. 13. The four-week average, a less volatile measure, declined for the third straight week to 408,000. That's the lowest average in eight weeks.

Still, applications are higher than they would be in a healthy economy. They need to fall consistently below 375,000 to signal sustainable job growth. They haven't been below that level since February.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Work
    idk if Mitch did us a good thing.... what if it was actually very bad? dont fall into his hypnotics
  • Mitch 54, where are you?
    Mitch seems all too quite for such a GOP based problem. He stressed for so long that Indiana was the best business climate and road construction and low taxes for corporations would bring jobs. It seems he is full of lies...almost like a.....dare I say....politician! OH NO!
  • A Mitch Unemployment rate
    Remember how Mitch and his GOP fellows said that stimulus money was not wanted. Indiana did not need to jump start the economy that he could do it better by himself. So he gave the state a buch of hype rah rah talk and our unemployment just goes up as Mitch's own self perception goes up.
  • Great Job Mitch!
    Great job Mitch. Indiana is doing better than any of the comparable economies here in the mid-west. Sure wish you would have decided to help out the whole country like you have helped Indiana.
  • Mitch whose man are you?
    Mayber the gov should quit worrying about his future employment- he has a job- or his book and start to work on the problems that face our state. It is not enough to be better off the next state over, our state deserves better, neither Mitch's buddies making money or Mitch's future aspirations help me or my neighbor.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT