IBJNews

Indianapolis courts Chicago Mercantile Exchange

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis' mayor has met with top executives of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange to discuss bringing the financial market to Indiana's largest city.

Mark Lotter, a spokesman for Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard, told The Associated Press that Ballard left a U.S. Conference of Mayors water council meeting early to talk to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Lotter says the parties met for about an hour Friday afternoon.

He says city and state officials have been discussing a possible move with the exchange for months.

Earlier this week, the Illinois House rejected a $250 million package of  tax breaks intended to keep businesses like the 163-year-old exchange and Sears Holding Corp. from leaving the state. The exchange has said it's considering leaving Illinois because of its business tax.

CME has 2,570 employees worldwide, with most of them located in Chicago. It reported more than $3 billion in revenue in 2010 and more than $950 million in earnings.

IBJ reported on the possibility of the move in October.

Illinois legislative leaders said they were determined to reach a deal in the coming days or weeks despite a rejection by the House.

The idea of giving tax breaks to companies is a hard sell in any state legislature when many families are struggling and the Occupy Wall Street movement is reflecting anger at corporate interests. But advocates say if Illinois doesn't take action, the businesses and their thousands of jobs will be lured away by states that are eager to take advantage.

The Illinois Senate approved the proposal Tuesday in a special session, but the House balked, sending lawmakers into further negotiations.

Illinois' tax dilemma is a collision between two different goals: Balancing the budget and avoiding the image of a state that's bad for business. And in the process, officials want to avoid being exploited by companies making threats, perhaps empty ones, to flee Illinois.

When 2011 began, the state faced a deficit projected to hit $15 billion. The Democratic governor and Democratic majorities in the Legislature decided an income tax increase had to be part of the response to that gap.

They bumped the individual tax rate to 5 percent, up from 3 percent originally, and the corporate rate to 7 percent, from 4.8 percent. The increase, most of which is temporary and will expire in stages over the next 15 years, is supposed to generate about $6.8 billion in its first year.

Other states pounced. New Jersey, Indiana, Wisconsin and more began promoting themselves to Illinois businesses. They succeeded in drawing some companies away, despite protestations from Illinois officials that the state still has a low overall tax burden.

In the months since then, the same Democratic governor and Democratic legislators have passed measures to cut business costs for workers' compensation and unemployment insurance costs. Now the package of tax breaks is on the table.

Doug Whitley, president of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, said officials went too far with the January tax increase.

"They overreached," Whitley said. "They're trying to bring the pendulum back to a more middle ground and they're trying to send a strong message to employers that elected officials are not oblivious to their outcry."

The proposed tax package would have renewed a $15 million income tax credit and a break on local property taxes for Sears, which has its headquarters in the Chicago suburbs.

The proposal also would have cut income taxes about $85 million for CME Group Inc. and CBOE Holdings Inc., which run the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board Options Exchange.

The companies complain that they are still taxed on every transaction they handle, as if all business is still conducted by shouting men on trading floors, when most of their trades are now done electronically by buyers and sellers who have no connection to Illinois. The legislation being discussed would tax the exchanges on only 27.54 percent of their revenues.

Some legislators question whether Sears, CME and CBOE would really uproot their operations and leave Illinois. They worry that giving the companies what they want will encourage similar demands from other businesses.

"What's going to stop the next big company from putting a gun to our head with the same type of threat?" said Rep. Mary Flowers, a Chicago Democrat.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Nah
    This will never happen. Chicago will not lose the Merc to of all places Indianapolis. Nothing against our city, mind you.
  • I Don't Think So
    This will never happen, Indiana is just playing into the CME's game with Illinois. They have absolutely NO intention on leaving, especially for a town like Indianapolis which lacks a proper international air connections and urban amenities. Indy should stick to courting less prestige intense corporations as we've proven we're not too bad at doing so.
  • Fair tax correction
    I'm not advocating it, but just for the record, the "Fair Tax" is not the same as a "flat tax" because the former includes an advance rebate to everyone for all the taxes up to the poverty level (or some other level determined by politicians). So low income people would pay an effectively tax rate of zero. As income increases, there is more marginal money to spend or invest. If spent, the taxes are paid, making the wealthier individuals pay a higher tax rate. Provided you were rich and spent enough money, the rebate effectively approaches zero percent, and the rich people's tax rate = published tax rate.

    Again, I'm not advocating it, as it certainly has it's own set of problems, but it would be a means to simplify the tax code.
  • The issue is about:
    The unfair tax is a federal proposal. The issue here is competition between states, which is good. States need to compete with each other to strive to do better.
  • Consumption taxes hurt the poor
    "Fair" Tax is anything but fair. A flat sales tax would be an effective increase on the poorest people. Rich people would have a disincentive to buy stuff, while the poorer people would still have to buy all of their daily goods with the bulk of their pay checks.

    A flat sales only tax would only benefit the richest at the detriment of the non-rich.

    Look at the effective tax rates of companies. They are some of the lowest in the world. Their rate might be high, but they chop away at what they actually pay with exemptions and credits in exchange for doing things that benefit society. Our tax code needs to be updated and streamlined. Not done away with.

    • offshore
      It's amazing we can compete at all in the world with all the inefficiencies our tax code incentive's.

      Fair Tax would mean no more B.S. income tax then tax-break-or-lose-us corporate extortion like this situation.

      They're probably just looking to extort a counter offer tax break from Chi-Town.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT