Indianapolis public safety chief leaving position

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former New York police commissioner hired to clean up and modernize the Indianapolis Police Department submitted his resignation Friday following more than a year of criticism over investigators' mishandling of evidence in a fatal crash involving an officer.

Public Safety Director Frank Straub will remain in his position possibly until Aug. 1 during a search for his replacement, the mayor's office said.

Straub's resignation came 11 days after the city's police chief resigned amid revelations that the department mishandled a blood sample taken from Officer David Bisard following the August 2010 crash. Drunken driving charges against Bisard have been dismissed by a judge because of trouble with the blood tests.

In a phone interview with The Associated Press, Straub denied that there was any connection between his resignation and flak over his management of the police department.

"This is something in all honesty that I've been thinking about for a long while now," Straub said. "I think when you are hired to re-engineer an organization ... it's a challenging position to be in."

Mayor Greg Ballard hired Straub in 2009 to oversee the city's public safety agencies. Straub had been police commissioner of White Plains, N.Y., for seven years. Both Straub's resignation letter and the mayor's statement touted Straub's accomplishments, including lower homicide levels, improved training, integrated agency operations and increased diversity.

"Frank Straub came to Indianapolis facing the difficult task of updating and modernizing the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department at the same time preparing for and successfully hosting the highest profile event in this city's history," Ballard said in a statement, referring to the 2012 Super Bowl. "It hasn't always been easy but meaningful reform seldom is."

In his resignation letter, Straub said he had been hired to "re-engineer" the police department and had largely succeeded, though he acknowledged there was still work to be done to address "systemic weaknesses" and restore public trust. He said his administration had overhauled the department's professional standards division — formerly known as internal affairs — and been "relentless" in pursuit of officers "who tarnish their badge."

In two years before Straub was hired, Indianapolis officers had been accused of trafficking drugs, arson, running a prostitution ring and taking bribes.

Since Straub's arrival, he has been dogged by trouble within the department, including claims of excessive force and the arrests of several officers on criminal charges. Straub has claimed the incidents came to light because he took a hard stand against corruption. He assailed what he described as a police culture that had tolerated bad behavior for decades.

Indianapolis Fraternal Order of Police President William Owensby has said he has never seen any signs of corruption within the department.

He released a statement saying the police union supported the mayor's announcement and was focused on budget issues that he said threatened the department's efforts at community policing.

The Bisard case proved to be a lightning rod for criticism throughout much of Straub's tenure.

An internal probe in 2011 concluded that the investigation had been botched and riddled with errors, but some critics suspected police were covering for one of their own.

The latest mistake happened in November, when prosecutors say police misplaced a vial of blood that prosecutors hoped could be used to show Bisard was drunk when he plowed into two motorcycles at a stoplight. Ballard said the blunder showed gross incompetence and possibly criminal intent.

Straub had recently faced a series of hearings before the city-county council's public safety committee as it considered whether to recommend renewing his contract. But Straub said he hadn't been concerned for his job.

"The mayor has been really clear that regardless of what city council vote was going to be, that I was going to stay if that was what I wanted to do," he said.

Straub said he was reviewing prospects for his next job.

"There's a bunch of possibilities out there," he said. "Now it's at a point of picking the right job in the right place."


  • The Mayor should be next
    and I know ppl aren't buying this story that he resigned on his own without having another job... lol I think the Mayor should resign for trying to sell garbage like that to the public.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...