IBJNews

Indy charter school gets gift valued at about $2M

Associated Press
October 27, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A central Indiana businessman and his wife have donated a gift valued as high as $2 million to an Indianapolis charter high school.

Steve Russell, of Carmel, founder of Indianapolis-based trucking company Celadon Group Inc., and his wife, Livia, gave the gift to Herron High School. It will go toward a $5.3 million capital campaign to renovate buildings on its campus, which formerly housed the Indianapolis Museum of Art and the Herron School of Art and Design at IUPUI.

The size of the gift wasn't disclosed, but The Indianapolis Star reported Sunday the high school's main building will be named for the couple. The naming right was priced at $2 million.

"What made me have success in life was education," Russell said.

Herron, a college preparatory school focused on classical liberal arts, opened in 2006 and currently serves 700 students.

Its buildings need upgrades, though, with cracks in its terrazzo floors, plumbing issues that forced the school to close early one day last week and walls too thick for wireless Internet.

"Right now, a lot of our money is going toward maintenance of these buildings, and we want it to be going into classrooms," said Joanna Taft, Herron's board president.

Public charter schools don't receive tax dollars for capital project funds to build or renovate buildings, said Kevin Davis, interim president of the Indiana Public Charter Schools Association.

Davis praised Herron's success in achieving a nearly 95-percent graduation rate.

"It's a real shining example of how a local charter school can grow," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Patriot
    Wow, Great gift! Now that's patriotism. Steve Russell and Company stepped up and shared his American Dream with the larger community.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT