IBJNews

Indy hospitals healthy despite sequester

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

As President Obama said, the pain of the federal sequester will be real. But when it comes to hospitals, how real and how painful depends on where they are and how big they are.

While rural hospitals face sharp reductions in their operating margins, most of the four major hospital systems based in Indianapolis will see only a marginal impact on their profits.

The 35 critical-access hospitals in Indiana—which have just 25 beds each and tend to be in rural areas—will see their operating margins chopped by 31 percent, according to data provided by the Indiana Rural Health Association.

Such hospitals now generate operating margins of just 1.58 percent, and a 12-month sequester would drop those margins to 1.09 percent. Operating margins reflect the profitability of a hospital’s health care services, and excludes any gains or losses recorded on investments.

“It’s a perfect storm, in my opinion,” said Don Kelso, executive director of the Indiana Rural Health Association. “Rising costs to provide care to the people that need the care at the same time your reimbursements are being cut."

But the story will be far different for the four large hospital systems based in Indianapolis.

If the 2-percent Medicare reimbursement cuts from the sequester had been effective in 2011—the most recent year for which local hospitals have reported financial results—their operating margins would have been reduced by 8 percent to 16 percent. Even those cuts would have left each hospital system with healthy margins of no less than 3.8 percent.

Indiana University Health would have seen its operating income of $186 million fall nearly $21 million, or about 11 percent. IU Health’s operating margin would have declined from 4.3 percent to 3.8 percent.

St. Vincent Health would have seen its operating income of $157.7 million fall about $12 million, or 7.6 percent. That cut would have reduced its margin from 7.2 percent to 6.7 percent.

Community Health Network would have seen its operating income of $75.7 million reduced about $7 million, or about 9 percent. That would have meant its operating margin would have been reduced from 5.6 percent to 5 percent.

Franciscan Alliance would have seen its operating income of $114.8 million fall $18.5 million, or about 16 percent. Its operating margin would have fallen from 5.2 percent to 4.4 percent.

According to a large physician practice based in Indianapolis, American Health Network, the impact of the cuts will be minimal in the short term for large health care providers. But the pain will be felt long term.

“We are always concerned about reductions in physician payments,” Don Stumpp, past president of the Indiana Medical Group Management Association, wrote in an e-mail.  “While a 2-percent cut will not be devastating, physician practice costs continue to increase like any business. There won't be any immediate impact, but if the cut isn't reversed, doctors will need to make some budgetary adjustments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Healthcare is Big Business
    Each of the large hospitals in the Indianapolis Area have recruited and paid top tier surgeons a significant salary, which in turn has brought business to these hospitals, not just from rural hospitals that are affiliated with these large hospitals, but also from hospitals in cities as far away as Cincinnati.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT