IBJNews

Indy hospitals healthy despite sequester

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

As President Obama said, the pain of the federal sequester will be real. But when it comes to hospitals, how real and how painful depends on where they are and how big they are.

While rural hospitals face sharp reductions in their operating margins, most of the four major hospital systems based in Indianapolis will see only a marginal impact on their profits.

The 35 critical-access hospitals in Indiana—which have just 25 beds each and tend to be in rural areas—will see their operating margins chopped by 31 percent, according to data provided by the Indiana Rural Health Association.

Such hospitals now generate operating margins of just 1.58 percent, and a 12-month sequester would drop those margins to 1.09 percent. Operating margins reflect the profitability of a hospital’s health care services, and excludes any gains or losses recorded on investments.

“It’s a perfect storm, in my opinion,” said Don Kelso, executive director of the Indiana Rural Health Association. “Rising costs to provide care to the people that need the care at the same time your reimbursements are being cut."

But the story will be far different for the four large hospital systems based in Indianapolis.

If the 2-percent Medicare reimbursement cuts from the sequester had been effective in 2011—the most recent year for which local hospitals have reported financial results—their operating margins would have been reduced by 8 percent to 16 percent. Even those cuts would have left each hospital system with healthy margins of no less than 3.8 percent.

Indiana University Health would have seen its operating income of $186 million fall nearly $21 million, or about 11 percent. IU Health’s operating margin would have declined from 4.3 percent to 3.8 percent.

St. Vincent Health would have seen its operating income of $157.7 million fall about $12 million, or 7.6 percent. That cut would have reduced its margin from 7.2 percent to 6.7 percent.

Community Health Network would have seen its operating income of $75.7 million reduced about $7 million, or about 9 percent. That would have meant its operating margin would have been reduced from 5.6 percent to 5 percent.

Franciscan Alliance would have seen its operating income of $114.8 million fall $18.5 million, or about 16 percent. Its operating margin would have fallen from 5.2 percent to 4.4 percent.

According to a large physician practice based in Indianapolis, American Health Network, the impact of the cuts will be minimal in the short term for large health care providers. But the pain will be felt long term.

“We are always concerned about reductions in physician payments,” Don Stumpp, past president of the Indiana Medical Group Management Association, wrote in an e-mail.  “While a 2-percent cut will not be devastating, physician practice costs continue to increase like any business. There won't be any immediate impact, but if the cut isn't reversed, doctors will need to make some budgetary adjustments.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Healthcare is Big Business
    Each of the large hospitals in the Indianapolis Area have recruited and paid top tier surgeons a significant salary, which in turn has brought business to these hospitals, not just from rural hospitals that are affiliated with these large hospitals, but also from hospitals in cities as far away as Cincinnati.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT