Sequester could sap $200M from Indiana health care providers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With the federal spending "sequestration" plan kicking in Friday, health care providers in Indiana are bracing for the loss of nearly $200 million in annual revenue.

The sequestration cuts will chop Medicare payments to hospitals, doctors and nursing homes by 2 percent, beginning April 1. The federal Medicare program for seniors is the largest health insurance plan in the nation, and cuts could hit low-margin rural hospitals especially hard.

Annual Medicare spending in Indiana is roughly $10 billion, according to data compiled by California-based Kaiser Health Foundation. That spending is funded via payroll tax deductions by taxpayers across the country.

Under sequestration, Hoosiers will be sending the same amount of tax revenue to Washington, but seeing a bit less of it come back to the state for health care spending.

It’s not entirely clear how much less, because the federal government has yet to detail how exactly it will implement the 2-percent cut. But the impact will be felt, because Medicare payments make up about 40 percent of the average hospital’s total revenue.

With average operating margins at hospitals running at just north of 4 percent, the Medicare cuts represent a potential 20-percent cut to hospital profits, on average.

“That means they’re going to have to respond with expense cuts. And most of their expenses are in salaries and wages, which is why most of them are looking at it dismally,” said Doug Leonard, president of the Indiana Hospital Association. He added, “The 2 percent cut is really a meat ax.”

The five hospital systems that operate in Marion County—Community Health Network, Indiana University Health, Franciscan St. Francis Health, St. Vincent Health and Wishard Health Services—stand to see revenue decline, collectively, $63.5 million, based on the percentage of revenue they derived from Medicare in 2011, according to the most recent financial data they have made public.

IU Health, which gets 24 percent of its $4.3 billion in annual revenue from Medicare, estimates it would collect $148 million less over the next decade, or about $15 million per year.

Community Health Network, which received 26 percent of its $1.3 billion in revenue from Medicare, said it expects reimbursement to decline by $1 million per month.

“We are working to try to find cost savings without impacting patient care,” wrote Lynda de Widt, a Community spokeswoman, in an e-mail.

A September study by Pittsburgh-based Tripp Umbach estimated that cuts to Indiana’s hospitals alone would lead to direct and indirect job losses of 10,700.

“There will just be a gradual reduction in services. Along with that will be a reduction in jobs,” said Don Kelso, executive director of the Indiana Rural Health Association, which represents rural hospitals that typically run at the lowest margins. “They will look at their service lines and see which ones are routinely losing money . They evaluate that and then see what would happen to their community.”

The hits to hospitals also will flow down to the thousands of physicians they employ. Independent physicians also likely will see their payments cut.

Nursing homes will be less affected by the Medicare cuts, because the program pays only for short-term stays. But with the state-run Medicaid program planning to maintain a 5 percent reimbursement cut that was passed two years ago, nursing homes are also feeling pinched.

Medicaid spending was exempted from the sequestration cuts, but the state of Indiana has kept reimbursements low in that program recently due to budget contraints induced by the recession of 2007 through 2009.

“The Medicare cuts under the sequestration combined with the proposed continued 5 percent Medicaid rate reductions in the pending Indiana budget result in a candle burning at both ends for all health care providers, especially long-term care providers who rely heavily on those funding streams to provide high-quality care to Indiana's seniors and families,” said Scott Tittle, president of the Indiana Health Care Association.

The sequestration plan will cut a total of $85 billion from all areas of the federal government, with defense and health care taking the biggest hits. The plan was adopted by Congress in 2011 as a worst-case option in order to force legislators to come up with a better deficit-reduction plan. But Republicans and Democrats in Washington could never agree on an alternate plan.


  • Just the Start
    Health care spending is going to be reduced one way or the other. This is just a start for what is going to happen in the next coupe of years. Under the health care reform we could see a huge % of the population take advantage of the health insurance exchange. The health plans offered are could have narrow networks. These narrow networks could have deeper discounts than traditional PPO plans. Then look at the possible Medicaid expansion. You add another 400k people to that plan the state will force the hospital to reduce rates even more. Health care spending is out of control, so one way or the other spending will go down. www.indianahealthinsurance.com www.indianahealthinsuranceexchange.com
  • Sequester??
    Sequester is in fact a reduction in spending growth. The democrats want everyone to believe that a reduction in spending growth is somehow a cut in spending. Spending is not being cut, increased spending is being scaled back.
  • 2% is nothing
    I do not doubt that some rural hospitals will have issues, but I do not feel sorry for the mega systems like IU Health. They will have $15 million less...big deal. In 2011 they made $415m on $2,911m in revenues. A "healthy" 14%! Govt spending needs to be cut. and if hospitals got less they'd learn to spend less...and squueze some fluff out of their system.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.