IBJNews

Indy Partnership names new executive director

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indy Partnership, which works to to a lure business to the region, has a new executive director.

Marty Vanags, the CEO of the Bloomington-Normal Economic Development Council in Illinois, will start work March 1, the Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce announced late Thursday.

The Indy Partnership became a business unit of the chamber last May in a merger that included Develop Indy, which does the same work on behalf of Marion County.

“Marty brings a strong track record of securing capital investment and attracting new jobs,” Indy Chamber CEO Scott Miller said in a prepared statement. “The nine-county Indianapolis region will benefit from his extensive experience in economic development as we pursue attracting new jobs and capital investment from around the country.”

Prior to joining the Bloomington-Normal Economic Development Council in 2004, Vanags worked as executive director of the Freeport Downtown Development Foundation and in various economic development capacities in Rockford, Illinois and Village of Machesney Park, Ill.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Business community
    Bloomington-Normal. Now there's a business magnet. Right up there with Silicon Valley. More tax dollars down the Indy is Special rat hole.
  • 1 Year
    What happened Troy Whittington? How's that merger going at the Indianapolis Chamber? New employer attraction or expansions? Better or worse than 1 year ago?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT