Interactive Intelligence reports higher profit, revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A rise in larger orders lifted Indianapolis-based Interactive Intelligence Inc. to higher profit and revenue in the fourth quarter.

The business-communications software firm said Friday morning that profit more than doubled to $10.4 million, or 54 cents per share, in the quarter ended Dec. 31, up from $5.1 million, or 28 cents per share, in the same period in 2009.

Profit beat analyst estimates by 4 cents, according to a survey of Thomson Reuters analysts.

Revenue leaped to $50.7 million, an increase of 41 percent over revenue of $35.9 million a year ago.

“Our fourth-quarter orders were very strong from both new and existing customers, with good contributions from North America, Europe and Australia,” said Interactive Intelligence CEO Donald E. Brown in a prepared statement.

Brown said orders of at least $250,000 jumped from 19 in the fourth quarter of 2009 to 31 in the same quarter last year.

For the year, the company reported profit of $26.5 million, or $1.40 per share, compared with $18.2 million, or $1 per share, in 2009.

Revenue in 2010 grew 27 percent, to $166.3 million.

Shares have soared nearly 30 percent since Interactive Intelligence provided a preview of the strong fourth-quarter earnings earlier this month.

Shares opened trading Friday morning at $34 each.

Brown said the outlook for 2011 is annual revenue of at least $200 million, or growth of 20 percent over 2010.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...