IBJNews

ISO reports smaller deficit, bigger endowment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana Symphony Society on Monday afternoon at its annual meeting said its financial condition is improving even though it suffered another fiscal-year deficit.

The society, the parent organization of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, said its expenses exceeded revenue by $1.7 million on a budget of $25.6 million for the 2010-2011 fiscal year ended Aug. 31. The deficit was $1 million smaller than the previous year and $1.1 million smaller than two years ago.

The society said earned revenue increased by 3 percent, to $8.1 million, and contributed income increased by 4 percent, to $6.25 million, compared with the previous season.

The ISO reduced its draw from the Indiana Symphony Orchestra Foundation to $7.3 million, a reduction of $848,000 from a year ago. The foundation’s balance as of Aug. 31 stood at $89 million, up from $83.5 million a year ago, but down from a high of $128 million in 2007.

Simon Crookall, president and CEO of the ISO, said the orchestra’s endowment campaign, which started in spring 2010, has raised $30.8 million in gifts and pledges toward its goal of $100 million.

Crookall said his goal is to have a balanced budget by the end of the 2014 fiscal year.

The ISO plans to continue reducing its reliance on the endowment so that the annual draw rate will represent 5 percent of a 36-month average, but it isn’t there yet. This last fiscal year the ISO drew 7.2 percent, which Crookall said that was the lowest amount since 2001.

Crookall said he wouldn’t have been able to reduce the draw without $2 million in “transitional funding” raised in the ongoing campaign.

The next goal for the campaign is to raise $20 million in 2012. Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay and Indiana Pacers owner Herb Simon, honorary campaign co-chairs, did not attend the meeting, but Crookall said both billionaires have already made pledges that'll be announced at a public event in the future.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT