IBJNews

ISO reports smaller deficit, bigger endowment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Symphony Society on Monday afternoon at its annual meeting said its financial condition is improving even though it suffered another fiscal-year deficit.

The society, the parent organization of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra, said its expenses exceeded revenue by $1.7 million on a budget of $25.6 million for the 2010-2011 fiscal year ended Aug. 31. The deficit was $1 million smaller than the previous year and $1.1 million smaller than two years ago.

The society said earned revenue increased by 3 percent, to $8.1 million, and contributed income increased by 4 percent, to $6.25 million, compared with the previous season.

The ISO reduced its draw from the Indiana Symphony Orchestra Foundation to $7.3 million, a reduction of $848,000 from a year ago. The foundation’s balance as of Aug. 31 stood at $89 million, up from $83.5 million a year ago, but down from a high of $128 million in 2007.

Simon Crookall, president and CEO of the ISO, said the orchestra’s endowment campaign, which started in spring 2010, has raised $30.8 million in gifts and pledges toward its goal of $100 million.

Crookall said his goal is to have a balanced budget by the end of the 2014 fiscal year.

The ISO plans to continue reducing its reliance on the endowment so that the annual draw rate will represent 5 percent of a 36-month average, but it isn’t there yet. This last fiscal year the ISO drew 7.2 percent, which Crookall said that was the lowest amount since 2001.

Crookall said he wouldn’t have been able to reduce the draw without $2 million in “transitional funding” raised in the ongoing campaign.

The next goal for the campaign is to raise $20 million in 2012. Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay and Indiana Pacers owner Herb Simon, honorary campaign co-chairs, did not attend the meeting, but Crookall said both billionaires have already made pledges that'll be announced at a public event in the future.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT