IBJNews

ITT Educational altered test scores, ex-employee's suit says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ITT Educational Services Inc., a Carmel-based for-profit education company, changed applicants’ test scores to allow them to enroll and get U.S. financial aid, an ex-employee says in a lawsuit.

Jason Halasa, who identified himself as the former director of ITT Educational’s campus in Lathrop, Calif., said in court documents that he was fired after he told company officials about altered grades. Halasa filed a complaint last week against ITT Educational, saying he was fired for speaking out. He is seeking reinstatement, back wages, legal costs and unspecified damages.

Students without high school diplomas must pass entrance examinations, called ability-to-benefit tests, to be eligible for U.S. financial aid for higher education, the Government Accountability Office said in a report in August. Some education companies changed applicants’ test grades and provided them with answers to ensure qualification for aid, the agency, which is the investigative arm of Congress, said without naming the enterprises.

“Halasa was attempting to halt conduct that was defrauding the federal government,” according to his complaint, filed in federal court in Indianapolis on April 15.

Lauren Littlefield, a spokeswoman for ITT Educational, didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment Wednesday.

ITT Educational stock was up $2.85, or 2.5 percent, to $118.16 per share in mid-afternoon trading Wednesday. The shares have gained 7.9 percent in the past 12 months.

After Halasa joined ITT Educational in February 2009, he saw employees in Lathrop giving passing scores to students who had failed entrance exams, according to the complaint. Employees raised students’ grades and altered attendance records so they would continue to receive U.S. financial aid, according to the complaint.

The company’s staff also compiled inaccurate job-placement figures for its graduates to make the company’s programs appear more valuable, according to the suit. After Halasa reported his findings to corporate officials, he was fired in September, according to the complaint.

Halasa is represented by Timothy Matusheski, who is a lawyer in Hattiesburg, Miss., and the firm Plews Shadley Racher & Braun of Indianapolis.

About 70 percent of ITT Educational’s $1.32 billion in revenue in 2009 came from the government’s Title IV financial-aid program, according to a company filing.

ITT Educational may lose its eligibility to participate in the program if the company changed grades and concealed violations, according to the complaint.

In 2002, the California Attorney General investigated ITT Educational’s calculation of students’ grade-point averages. The company agreed to pay $725,000 to settle the probe.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Best Education $ Can Buy
    Even if this is a few isolated cases,it cheapens ITT stand in the public's perception. It puts ITT squarely in the list of only "What's in it for Me". But we knew that because they are for Profit company. They are no better than Toyota, Enron, and the Big Banks that caused the financial crisis of 2008/2009.
  • ITT Educational
    No shocker here...altering test scores to keep the federal funds conming!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT