IBJNews

Enrollment, profit fall at ITT Educational

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ITT Educational Services Inc. signed up fewer students and saw fewer profits in the first quarter, but it still beat the expectations of Wall Street analysts.

The Carmel-based operator of for-profit colleges earned $85.4 million in the three months ended March 31, a 2.4-percent decline from the same quarter a year ago.

But ITT has boosted its earnings per share by buying back shares, including 2 million in the first quarter and more than 6 million in the last year.

That allowed the company to post earnings per share of $2.91, an increase from $2.46 in the same quarter last year.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters were expected earnings per share of $2.54 in the most recent quarter.

Enrollment of new students in the quarter fell 5.6 percent compared with the same period last year, to 21,761. Overall, ITT’s enrollment slipped 0.6 percent, to 84,030.

Fewer students contributed to a slight dip in revenue of 0.2 percent, for a quarterly total of $383.2 million. Analysts were expected revenue of $383.7 million.

Enrollment has been declining at for-profit colleges after the U.S. Education Department increased restrictions on recruiting. Beginning this year, the Obama administration will require for-profit colleges to ensure that at least 45 percent of former students are paying down their loans beginning four years after leaving school.

If schools’ former students fail to achieve that threshold, the government will not allow a for-profit education program to get student-loan funding to raise its enrollment levels. And if repayment rates fall below 35 percent, the government would cut off student-loan funding entirely for any new students.

Since the Obama administration announced the details of those new rules in July, ITT’s shares have lost a quarter of their value. They closed Wednesday at $66.05 apiece.

ITT stock surged by as much as 9 percent in morning trading. Shares traded at $68.79 each, up 4.2 percent, at midday.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Lobster Dinner
    It's the Youngstown way of doing things
  • Lobster Dinner?
    Please let me know which ITT Financial Aid Office is getting lobster dinners because we certainly are not getting them at the ITT Financial Aid Office I work in. I think I need to transfer to that office instead of getting the leftovers from the student appreciation pizzas.
    • do not go there
      Do NOT pay over $400 a credit hour at ITT. There are more affordable options out there. IUPUI is at about $241 a credit hour, Ivy Tech is like $100 to $200 a credit hour.. take the credit hour and times it by 3cr hr. an average class is 3 credit hours... please stop and consider options. for an undergrad degree, you are only aloud a max of $57,000. you will max out and not even have a degree at ITT. It is not worth the money, trust me I went there and wasted a whole year, and couldnt even transfer my credits... :(
    • lack of equipment
      I go here. They say it's education for the future? We are using old outdated software and out we have to use our teacher's own personal camera for film and video production class. ITT allows the Financial Aid department to have Lobster dinner that cost $715!

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

      2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

      3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

      4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

      5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.

      ADVERTISEMENT