IBJNews

ITT Educational's quarterly profit, revenue climb

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fourth-quarter earnings for ITT Educational Services Inc. topped analysts’ expectations, as profit rose 49 percent compared to the same period a year ago.

The Carmel-based for-profit educator said Thursday morning that its profit in the quarter climbed to $93.7 million.

ITT earned $2.56 per share, topping Wall Street analyst predictions of $2.36 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Financial Network. A year ago, the company earned $1.61 per share.

Revenue in the fourth quarter spiked 33.8 percent, to $374.4 million.

“We are very pleased with our results in the final quarter and full year of 2009, ITT CEO Kevin M. Modany said in a prepared statement. “As we begin the new year, we believe that we are well positioned to achieve our internal financial and operating goals for 2010.”

For the entire year, profit rose 49 percent, to $300 million. Revenue was $1.3 billion, a 29.9-percent increase over 2008.

Student enrollment in the fourth quarter increased to 19,563, up 31.2 percent from the fourth quarter in 2008. Total student enrollment for the year grew to 80,766, a 30.3-percent increase compared to 2008.

In spite of the growth, the company said its bad-debt expenses, as a percentage of revenue, grew to 6.9 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with 4.9 percent in the year-ago period.

Some analysts and investors are worried that the recession is keeping fewer ITT graduates from finding jobs, causing them to default on their loans.

ITT shares opened Thursday morning at $97.91 each, a 26-percent decline since they peaked in early February 2009.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

ADVERTISEMENT