IBJNews

ITT Educational's quarterly profit, revenue climb

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fourth-quarter earnings for ITT Educational Services Inc. topped analysts’ expectations, as profit rose 49 percent compared to the same period a year ago.

The Carmel-based for-profit educator said Thursday morning that its profit in the quarter climbed to $93.7 million.

ITT earned $2.56 per share, topping Wall Street analyst predictions of $2.36 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Financial Network. A year ago, the company earned $1.61 per share.

Revenue in the fourth quarter spiked 33.8 percent, to $374.4 million.

“We are very pleased with our results in the final quarter and full year of 2009, ITT CEO Kevin M. Modany said in a prepared statement. “As we begin the new year, we believe that we are well positioned to achieve our internal financial and operating goals for 2010.”

For the entire year, profit rose 49 percent, to $300 million. Revenue was $1.3 billion, a 29.9-percent increase over 2008.

Student enrollment in the fourth quarter increased to 19,563, up 31.2 percent from the fourth quarter in 2008. Total student enrollment for the year grew to 80,766, a 30.3-percent increase compared to 2008.

In spite of the growth, the company said its bad-debt expenses, as a percentage of revenue, grew to 6.9 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with 4.9 percent in the year-ago period.

Some analysts and investors are worried that the recession is keeping fewer ITT graduates from finding jobs, causing them to default on their loans.

ITT shares opened Thursday morning at $97.91 each, a 26-percent decline since they peaked in early February 2009.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT