IBJNews

ITT, other for-profit education firms face more oversight

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Education Secretary Arne Duncan will step up oversight of federal student financial-aid programs after an undercover government investigation found deceptive marketing practices at 15 for-profit colleges.

For-profit college stocks fell after the U.S. Department of Education released data that said fewer than 36 percent of the colleges’ students repaid federal loans, compared with 54 percent at public universities.

Shares in ITT Educational Services Inc., based in Carmel, declined 13 percent Monday morning, to $56.02 each, after being downgraded to “equal weight” from “overweight” at Barclays Capital.

Duncan vowed to expand the Education Department’s enforcement staff, conduct undercover probes and increase the number of program reviews, according to a letter to Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) that was obtained by Bloomberg News. The education department released data that details the earnings and debt repayment of for-profit college graduates. Proposed agency rules would restrict funds to programs whose graduates have poor records of repaying student loans.

ITT , Apollo Group Inc. and Career Education Corp. have fallen in U.S. markets as Harkin has held hearings on sales practices at for-profit colleges and their reliance on federal student grants and loans. The Education Department will hire more than 60 investigators and increase the number of program reviews by 50 percent after the inquiry by the Government Accountability Office, Duncan said in the letter, which was confirmed by the department.

“The unethical and potentially illegal practices uncovered by GAO are unacceptable,” Duncan said. “We have a responsibility to ensure that students can make informed choices about investing in postsecondary education, and that taxpayers’ investments in the federal student-aid programs are helping students.”

ITT Educational plunged $4.97, or 7.2 percent, on Friday, to $64.33 per share.

Apollo Group, the Phoenix-based operator of the University of Phoenix, fell $1.53, or 3.8 percent, to $38.94. Career Education fell 80 cents, or 4.1 percent, to $18.79. An index of 12 education stocks fell 5.1 percent and has dropped 27 percent in the past six months.

The Education Department’s Inspector General will review the GAO’s findings and potentially refer individuals for criminal prosecution, Duncan’s letter said. The department is also considering enforcement action against schools that could result either in the return of federal money or the loss of a college’s eligibility for federal financial aid, according to the letter.

The industry welcomes additional Education Department scrutiny, Harris Miller, president of the Washington-based Career College Association, said in a telephone interview.

“We look forward to working with the department,” said Miller, whose group represents more than 1,400 for-profit colleges. “We’re not supportive, and we’ve never been supportive, of schools or employees violating the law or accreditation requirements.”

The University of Phoenix supports “robust student protections,” Manny Rivera, an Apollo Group spokesman, said in an e-mail.

Career Education, based in Hoffman Estates, Ill., said any review should focus broadly on all kinds of colleges, spokesman Jeff Leshay said. Lauren Littlefield, a spokeswoman for ITT Educational, didn’t return a call seeking comment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT