IBJNews

ITT, other for-profit education firms face more oversight

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Education Secretary Arne Duncan will step up oversight of federal student financial-aid programs after an undercover government investigation found deceptive marketing practices at 15 for-profit colleges.

For-profit college stocks fell after the U.S. Department of Education released data that said fewer than 36 percent of the colleges’ students repaid federal loans, compared with 54 percent at public universities.

Shares in ITT Educational Services Inc., based in Carmel, declined 13 percent Monday morning, to $56.02 each, after being downgraded to “equal weight” from “overweight” at Barclays Capital.

Duncan vowed to expand the Education Department’s enforcement staff, conduct undercover probes and increase the number of program reviews, according to a letter to Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) that was obtained by Bloomberg News. The education department released data that details the earnings and debt repayment of for-profit college graduates. Proposed agency rules would restrict funds to programs whose graduates have poor records of repaying student loans.

ITT , Apollo Group Inc. and Career Education Corp. have fallen in U.S. markets as Harkin has held hearings on sales practices at for-profit colleges and their reliance on federal student grants and loans. The Education Department will hire more than 60 investigators and increase the number of program reviews by 50 percent after the inquiry by the Government Accountability Office, Duncan said in the letter, which was confirmed by the department.

“The unethical and potentially illegal practices uncovered by GAO are unacceptable,” Duncan said. “We have a responsibility to ensure that students can make informed choices about investing in postsecondary education, and that taxpayers’ investments in the federal student-aid programs are helping students.”

ITT Educational plunged $4.97, or 7.2 percent, on Friday, to $64.33 per share.

Apollo Group, the Phoenix-based operator of the University of Phoenix, fell $1.53, or 3.8 percent, to $38.94. Career Education fell 80 cents, or 4.1 percent, to $18.79. An index of 12 education stocks fell 5.1 percent and has dropped 27 percent in the past six months.

The Education Department’s Inspector General will review the GAO’s findings and potentially refer individuals for criminal prosecution, Duncan’s letter said. The department is also considering enforcement action against schools that could result either in the return of federal money or the loss of a college’s eligibility for federal financial aid, according to the letter.

The industry welcomes additional Education Department scrutiny, Harris Miller, president of the Washington-based Career College Association, said in a telephone interview.

“We look forward to working with the department,” said Miller, whose group represents more than 1,400 for-profit colleges. “We’re not supportive, and we’ve never been supportive, of schools or employees violating the law or accreditation requirements.”

The University of Phoenix supports “robust student protections,” Manny Rivera, an Apollo Group spokesman, said in an e-mail.

Career Education, based in Hoffman Estates, Ill., said any review should focus broadly on all kinds of colleges, spokesman Jeff Leshay said. Lauren Littlefield, a spokeswoman for ITT Educational, didn’t return a call seeking comment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT