IBJNews

ITT stock sinks after profit plunges 42 percent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

ITT Educational Services Inc.'s stock took a licking Thursday after its quarterly earnings report badly missed expectations of Wall Street analysts.

Carmel-based ITT said Thursday morning that it earned $46 million, down nearly 42 percent from the same quarter a year earlier.

The company's shares fell more than 20 percent before rebounding slightly later in the day. Shares closed down about 15 percent, at $43.14 each.

On a per-share basis, ITT earned $1.96, down from $2.85. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected $2.18 per share; even the most bearish analyst expected $1.97.

Revenue fell 15 percent, to $329.8 million. Analysts were expecting more than $339 million.

ITT tried to boost its earnings per share by purchasing 928,000 of its shares during the quarter at a total price of more than $61 million.

Demand for ITT’s associate’s and bachelor’s degree programs has slackened after a wave of students entered its halls during the recession. Also, stricter rules by the Obama administration have forced for-profit colleges to adjust their recruiting practices.

ITT’s new-student enrollment during the second quarter fell 9.5 percent, to 15,698 students. It was the first quarter in more than a year in which new-student enrollment did not fall at least 14 percent.

Shares of ITT Educational closed Wednesday at $50.43. They are down more than 11 percent since the beginning of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT