IBJNews

IU breaks ground on $25M lab building at IUPUI

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana University will break ground Wednesday afternoon on a $25 million science and engineering laboratory building on the IUPUI campus in downtown Indianapolis.

The facility will include nearly 34,000 square feet of research and classroom space. It is the first phase of a planned two-stage project to improve the university’s research facilities. Total cost has yet to be determined, an IU spokesman said.

The new building will be located on North Blackford Street west of Inlow Hall.

The project is funded primarily by a portion of research grants set aside for the building and also by funds from the Purdue University School of Engineering and Technology, which will use part of the facility.

“This facility addresses a critical need for space, a result of the continued expansion of both research and enrollment at the school,” said Simon Rhodes, dean of IUPUI’s School of Science, in a prepared statement. “Given our current trajectory, this new space will be just the beginning.”

Rhodes will be joined at the groundbreaking by IU President Michael McRobbie, IUPUI Chancellor Charles Bantz and other IU and Purdue officials.

The additional research and lab space is part of an aggressive building campaign launched by McRobbie in early 2010.

He said then that the university wanted to construct at least 12 buildings on its Bloomington and Indianapolis campuses in an effort to connect the IU School of Medicine with its partner IU Health and with a life sciences corridor northwest of downtown.

IU is counting on raising $1.1 billion in private funds for additional buildings at IUPUI.

The building campaign includes the IU Neurosciences building under construction on West 16th Street near IU Health’s Methodist Hospital. The $53 million building will have 150,000 square feet of research space.

Already opened is the $20 million Glick Eye Institute, funded by Eugene and Marilyn Glick, west of IU Hospital.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT