IBJNews

IU success spurs Big Ten tourney ticket sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The resurgence of the Indiana University men’s basketball team is expected to help boost ticket sales at the Big Ten tournament to levels unseen in several years.

Total attendance for the four-day event that tips off at 11:30 a.m. Thursday at Bankers Life Fieldhouse in downtown Indianapolis is expected to top last year’s figure of 86,767 and could even surpass the 90,000 mark, last reached in 2006.

“When the local teams are playing well, it definitely brings an added excitement and extra demand for those tickets,” said John Dedman, spokesman for the Indiana Sports Corp., which helps organize the tournament. “There’s an excitement we haven’t seen around IU, in particular, in the last couple of years.”

The Hoosiers, a No. 5 seed, enter the tournament ranked 15th in the nation with a 24-7 record. They will play Penn State University, the No. 12 seed, in the second game on Thursday, starting 30 minutes after the first game ends.

Purdue University, the No. 6 seed, is unranked in national polls but finished with a 20-11 record. The Boilermakers will play the University of Nebraska in the fourth and final game Thursday night.

This is the first year Nebraska is competing in the tournament as the newest member of the Big Ten, which also should help push attendance higher.

The Cornhuskers won just four games this year in conference play and have an overall record of 12-17. But organizers say the team’s mere presence will boost attendance because a fourth game has been added to the first day’s schedule to accommodate 12 teams. Under the new schedule, only four teams receive a first-round bye instead of the usual five.

In past years, one ticket bought entry into all three first-round games. Now separate tickets are needed for the two afternoon games and two evening games.

Meanwhile, Indianapolis’ run of hosting both men’s and women’s Big Ten tournaments ends this year, and officials at the fieldhouse already are looking ahead to next year to fill scheduling gaps created by the losses.
 
The men’s tournament alternated between Indianapolis and Chicago beginning in 2002 before Indianapolis won the bid in 2008 to host it outright on an annual basis for five years. The women’s Big Ten tournament has been played in Indianapolis every year since it started in 1995. The women’s tournament this year ran from March 1-4 and had total attendance of 38,748.

Starting next year, both the men and women's tourneys will be played at United Center in Chicago. They will return to Indianapolis in 2014 and 2016.

Pacers Sports & Entertainment executives have submitted scheduling requests for next March to the National Basketball Association to help compensate for the loss of the tournaments.

They want the Pacers to play more home games during the beginning of the month, when the tournaments are typically here and go on the road more later in the month. Fieldhouse officials have booked a “very significant” family-type show they wouldn't reveal to occupy the facility when the Pacers are gone.

“It’s a domino situation,” said Rick Fuson, PS&E vice president and director of Bankers Life Fieldhouse. “But we ultimately hope to make [the fieldhouse] the permanent home of the Big Ten championships. It’s a great economic generator for not only here, but for the city.”

The men’s games are responsible for $11.2 million of the total $13.6 million in annual economic impact the two tournaments bring to the city, hospitality officials say.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Flagship
    IU is the flagship university of this state. Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT