IBJNews

IU success spurs Big Ten tourney ticket sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The resurgence of the Indiana University men’s basketball team is expected to help boost ticket sales at the Big Ten tournament to levels unseen in several years.

Total attendance for the four-day event that tips off at 11:30 a.m. Thursday at Bankers Life Fieldhouse in downtown Indianapolis is expected to top last year’s figure of 86,767 and could even surpass the 90,000 mark, last reached in 2006.

“When the local teams are playing well, it definitely brings an added excitement and extra demand for those tickets,” said John Dedman, spokesman for the Indiana Sports Corp., which helps organize the tournament. “There’s an excitement we haven’t seen around IU, in particular, in the last couple of years.”

The Hoosiers, a No. 5 seed, enter the tournament ranked 15th in the nation with a 24-7 record. They will play Penn State University, the No. 12 seed, in the second game on Thursday, starting 30 minutes after the first game ends.

Purdue University, the No. 6 seed, is unranked in national polls but finished with a 20-11 record. The Boilermakers will play the University of Nebraska in the fourth and final game Thursday night.

This is the first year Nebraska is competing in the tournament as the newest member of the Big Ten, which also should help push attendance higher.

The Cornhuskers won just four games this year in conference play and have an overall record of 12-17. But organizers say the team’s mere presence will boost attendance because a fourth game has been added to the first day’s schedule to accommodate 12 teams. Under the new schedule, only four teams receive a first-round bye instead of the usual five.

In past years, one ticket bought entry into all three first-round games. Now separate tickets are needed for the two afternoon games and two evening games.

Meanwhile, Indianapolis’ run of hosting both men’s and women’s Big Ten tournaments ends this year, and officials at the fieldhouse already are looking ahead to next year to fill scheduling gaps created by the losses.
 
The men’s tournament alternated between Indianapolis and Chicago beginning in 2002 before Indianapolis won the bid in 2008 to host it outright on an annual basis for five years. The women’s Big Ten tournament has been played in Indianapolis every year since it started in 1995. The women’s tournament this year ran from March 1-4 and had total attendance of 38,748.

Starting next year, both the men and women's tourneys will be played at United Center in Chicago. They will return to Indianapolis in 2014 and 2016.

Pacers Sports & Entertainment executives have submitted scheduling requests for next March to the National Basketball Association to help compensate for the loss of the tournaments.

They want the Pacers to play more home games during the beginning of the month, when the tournaments are typically here and go on the road more later in the month. Fieldhouse officials have booked a “very significant” family-type show they wouldn't reveal to occupy the facility when the Pacers are gone.

“It’s a domino situation,” said Rick Fuson, PS&E vice president and director of Bankers Life Fieldhouse. “But we ultimately hope to make [the fieldhouse] the permanent home of the Big Ten championships. It’s a great economic generator for not only here, but for the city.”

The men’s games are responsible for $11.2 million of the total $13.6 million in annual economic impact the two tournaments bring to the city, hospitality officials say.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Flagship
    IU is the flagship university of this state. Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT