IBJNews

Ivy Tech to go after student debtors' tax refunds

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Students who owe Ivy Tech Community College money will have their tax refunds diverted to cover the debt under a new policy the statewide college system is implementing.

Ivy Tech is asking the Indiana Department of Revenue to divert the refunds through a tax-intercept program that's commonly used to collect unpaid child support.

The move is the latest effort by the college system to collect on money it's owed. Ivy Tech loses out on about $12 million each year because of student-owed debt, which amounts to about 1.5 percent of the college's general fund, Chief Financial Officer Chris Ruhl told The Herald-Bulletin of Anderson. Collection agencies are only able to recover about $1 million a year.

The tax-intercept program, which also is used by Purdue University, has been available for years, but this is the first time Ivy Tech has implemented it, Ruhl said.

Ruhl said most of the money owed is not related to overdue tuition but is instead tied to federal financial aid programs such as Title IV and Pell Grants.

Students who receive such aid and drop a class before attending 60 percent of the 15-week period owe the federal government money. But they actually owe the school money, because Ivy Tech has to pay it back.

Debtors will be notified of the policy and have 30 days to appeal.

From the college's standpoint, the loss of money adds up quickly and can impact its ability to expand its offerings.

"Every dollar paid here is put back into academic services," Ruhl said.

Ivy Tech already bars students from registering for classes if they owe money. Students who owe even a parking ticket or library fine aren't allowed to graduate until they settle their debt.

Ivy Tech also plans to limit the amount of federal money it forwards to students by monitoring bookstore credits so that it pays out what is actually needed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT