Johnson & Johnson is building a warehouse in Hendricks County that is expected to create 465 jobs when completed in mid-2011.
The distribution arm of the New Jersey-based manufacturer of health care and consumer products is building the facility in
the 70 West Commerce Park at Interstate 70 and State Road 39, said Cinda Kelley, executive director of the Hendricks County
Economic Development Partnership.
“We are nationally known and identified as a distribution hub,” Kelley said. “So this is just one more
additional project that we’ve been successful in landing.”
Hendricks County, and particularly Plainfield, are home to several large industrial parks. The 12 million-square-foot Airwest
Business Park and 4.7 million-square-foot AirTech Park are among the largest.
The $82 million, 1.1 million-square-foot Johnson & Johnson development will be the first in the new 1,000-acre industrial
park west of Plainfield.
The Hendricks County Council approved a 10-year property-tax abatement.
Also, the county received assistance from the state to help land the project. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. will
provide Hendricks County with $300,000 to help with infrastructure improvements, and the Indiana Department of Transportation
will kick in $400,000 for additional road improvements.
“This was a true collaborative effort between the state, INDOT and Hendricks County to get this project in Hendricks
County,” Kelley said.
She said the county beat out competing sites in several states to win the project.

















graham. they are even better w/ roasted marshmallows and melted chocolate
Apparently ticket sales are slow too...mas emails have been sent by the speedway in a last ditch attempt to get place fans to come.
Garden Valley Veggie flavor Wheat Thins Toasted Chips. Don't judge until you try them, haters!
Doc, a few important errors in your statements:
(1) The developer is spending the CITY'S money (the city is paying for the cost of the garage), so the city can damn well insist on a quality design.
(2) The LAW requires the proposed building to comply with design standards, and insisting that people follow the law is not giving anyone the "run-around."
(3) A two-week delay to make some minimal aesthetic improvements is hardly a great imposition being imposed on the developer.
(4) If the developer would rather build a crappy building elsewhere with their own money, then they are welcome to pick up and do so.
(4) Indianapolis is a major city, not some podunk town that needs to spread its legs for any developer that throws the place a sideways glance. Indianapolis should insist on the best, not settle for junk. Accepting anything is not going to make Indianapolis grow any faster (not sure where you got that silly notion from), nor is Indianapolis a slow-growth city compared to similarly sized city's in the Midwest.
Alone. Or with cheese.