IBJNews

Judge rejects Fair Finance attorneys' fee request

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawyers helping the Fair Finance Co. bankruptcy trustee recover funds on behalf of shareholders will not be paid based on a percentage of the money they recover—a potentially lucrative proposal.

A federal judge in Ohio on Tuesday rejected the compensation plan submitted by Cleveland-based Baker & Hostetler LLP that could have netted the law firm $32.5 million if it recovered the entire $200 million or more owed to investors.

Since early 2010, trustee Brian Bash has been trying to recover funds for investors of Ohio-based Fair Finance, which was led by convicted Indianapolis financier Tim Durham until his financial empire collapsed in late 2009.

A federal jury in Indianapolis last month returned a guilty verdict on all 12 felony counts for Durham, on eight of 12 counts for co-owner James Cochran, and five of 12 counts for Rick Snow, the company’s chief financial officer.

The government had accused the men of running Fair Finance as a Ponzi scheme that stole more than $200 million from 5,000 Ohio investors who purchased investment certificates from the consumer-loan company.

On Tuesday, Judge Marilyn Shea-Stonum, who is overseeing the Fair Finance case in a bankruptcy court in Akron, dismissed the law firm's request to be paid on a contingency basis instead of hourly.

Shea-Stonum had said earlier this month during a hearing that it appeared the firm was trying “to change compensation 27 months into the case” and called the proposal “troubling,” according to the Akron Beacon Journal.

The proposal called for Bash’s firm, Baker & Hostetler, to be paid 30 percent of the first $50 million recovered, 15 percent of recoveries from $50 million to $100 million; and 10 percent of recoveries of more than $100 million.

As of May 31, Baker & Hostetler lawyers have billed more than $5.8 million in fees for their work pursuing judgments in favor of the investors, and have been paid $1.3 million, according to court documents. They’re still owed $4.5 million, but agreed to forego $1.6 million of that amount if the judge had approved the contingency fee proposal.

During testimony in the Fair Finance trial last month, Bash said lawyers had recovered $5.6 million on behalf of investors, about double what they had recovered in March when they made the request for the fee change.

“Although the trustee believes that significant additional cash will be recovered as a result of the trustee’s lawsuits, there can be no guarantee of that result,” lawyers wrote in a court filing. “Under Baker & Hostetler’s current compensation arrangement, however, the firm will continue to incur substantial hourly professional fees in pending litigation regardless of success. Therefore, the trustee seeks to modify the existing compensation agreement.”

The attorney fees owed to Baker & Hostetler don’t include about $720,000 of trustee payments, according to the documents.

Bash has more than 120 lawsuits still pending that seek to recover investor funds.

Durham and Cochran bought Fair Finance from Donald Fair in 2002.

A sentencing date has not been set.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Greed Greed Greed
    Same-O, Same-O! First we see Tim Durham's Greed, and now we see his attorney's Greed! What a total bunch of Looooosers!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT