Judges consider tossing $60M Penn State fund lawsuit

Associated Press
June 19, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A panel of Pennsylvania judges will soon decide whether to side with the NCAA and throw out a lawsuit filed by a state senator and the state treasurer over the massive fine imposed on Penn State for its handling of the Jerry Sandusky scandal.

The legal issue before Commonwealth Court is the NCAA's "preliminary objections" to the lawsuit, which seeks to force Penn State to pay the $60 million into a state government account.

The lawsuit by state Sen. Jake Corman and Treasurer Rob McCord is part of an effort by many of Pennsylvania's top elected officials to ensure the money will be spent within the state rather than throughout the country, although in either case it will be spent on child abuse prevention and for its victims.

The consent agreement made last summer between the NCAA and Penn State directs that a task force will distribute the money, while a Corman-sponsored law enacted early this year would keep it in Pennsylvania and have it distributed by the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency.

The first of five $12 million payments has been set aside by Penn State but not paid to the NCAA.

NCAA lawyer Everett Johnson argued Wednesday that McCord and Corman lack legal standing, that the new law that Corman sponsored is unconstitutional and that Penn State's relevance to the case makes the university such an indispensable party that the case can't proceed without it.

Johnson said the new law, formally known as the Institution of Higher Education Monetary Penalty Endowment Act, "represents an expansive intrusion into the historical autonomy of Penn State," and argued it was "a self-evidently protectionist law" that violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Corman's lawyer Matt Haverstick told the court the General Assembly "gave itself the obligation and the burden" to put some rules in place for the money, which he said could be traced to taxpayers. Penn State is considered a state-related university but is not a state agency, even though it gets hundreds of millions of dollars in state support every year.

"It's not the NCAA's money," Haverstick said. "The consent decree says nothing about whose money it is."

The judges pressed Haverstick on why the plaintiffs did not also sue Penn State.

"No one ever sues Penn State in any of this litigation that's floating around," said Judge Dan Pellegrini. "Isn't your complaint with Penn State?"

Haverstick said both Penn State and the NCAA control where the money will go.

Haverstick said the case raised questions that will require more time to establish all the facts, and that courts must grant considerable deference to the General Assembly when the issue is whether one of its laws is constitutional.

Pellegrini told the lawyers the court would not rule for at least 48 hours so the parties could consider whether to participate in mediation.

Sandusky the school's former assistant football coach, was convicted a year ago of 45 counts of child abuse involving 10 boys. The 69-year-old is serving a 30-to-60-year state prison sentence but maintains his innocence and is pursuing appeals.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I had read earlier this spring that Noodles & Co was going to open in the Fishers Marketplace (which is SR 37 and 131st St, not 141st St, just FYI). Any word on that? Also, do you happen to know what is being built in Carmel at Pennsylvania and Old Meridian? May just be an office building but I'm not sure.

  2. I'm sorry, but you are flat out wrong. There are few tracks in the world with the history of IMS and probably NO OTHER as widely known and recognized. I don't care what you think about the stat of Indy Car racing, these are pretty hard things to dispute.

  3. Also wondering if there is an update on the Brockway Pub-Danny Boy restaurant/taproom that was planned for the village as well?

  4. Why does the majority get to trample on the rights of the minority? You do realize that banning gay marriage does not rid the world of gay people, right? They are still going to be around and they are still going to continue to exist. The best way to get it all out of the spotlight? LEGALIZE IT! If gay marriage is legal, they will get to stop trying to push for it and you will get to stop seeing it all over the news. Why do Christians get to decide what is moral?? Why do you get to push your religion on others? How would legalizing gay marriage expose their lifestyle to your children? By the way, their lifestyle is going to continue whether gay marriage is legalized or not. It's been legal in Canada for quite a while now and they seem to be doing just fine. What about actual rules handed down by God? What about not working on Sundays? What about obeying your parents? What about adultery? These are in the 10 Commandments, the most important of God's rules. Yet they are all perfectly legal. What about divorce? Only God is allowed to dissolve a marriage so why don't you work hard to get divorce banned? Why do you get to pick and choose the parts of the Bible you care about?

  5. Look at the bright side. With the new Lowe's call center, that means 1000 jobs at $10 bucks an hour. IMS has to be drooling over all that disposable income. If those employees can save all their extra money after bills, in five years they can go to the race LIVE. Can you say attendance boost?