IBJNews

Judge's disclosure rules broader than Bren Simon sought

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A Hamilton County judge handling the Melvin Simon estate battle has set confidentiality rules on financial and personal information that are less restrictive than what his widow, Bren Simon, had been seeking.

Attorneys for Bren had asked at a March 10 hearing that information related to household expenses, health and other personal matters be disclosed to no one beyond the plaintiff in the will contest—Melvin’s daughter Deborah—and her attorneys, and in some cases only her attorneys.

In a newly filed order, Judge William J. Hughes permitted dissemination to others who might have a financial interest in the estate, so long as they sign agreements to keep the information confidential. That includes Deborah's two siblings from Melvin’s first marriage, Cynthia Simon-Skjodt and David Simon, the CEO of Simon Property Group.

Attorneys for Deborah had argued for broad disclosure. But attorneys for Bren had bristled, saying the siblings were never entitled to see Melvin and Bren's financial information, even when they were living together years ago.

"If their interest is that strong and heartfelt, they should be willing to join as parties," David Beehler, an attorney for Bren, said at the hearing.

Deborah is asking the court to throw out changes to Melvin’s estate plan executed in February 2009, seven months before he died at age 82. She contends he was suffering from dementia and didn't understand what he was doing when he signed off on the plan, boosting the share of his fortune going directly to her stepmother, Bren, from one-third to one-half.

The changes also wiped out a portion that was to go to Deborah and her siblings.

Bren, 66, who married Melvin in 1972, contends the changes fully reflected Melvin’s wishes.

The protective order Hughes issued Tuesday likely won’t put all disclosure disputes to rest. Much of the information deemed confidential may be central to issues that surface during court hearings or at trial. Hughes ordered the parties to cooperate on ground rules for disclosing such information in open court, an apparent effort to limit the need for him to intervene.

Melvin Simon was one of Indiana’s richest men. Forbes magazine in March 2009 estimated his net worth at $1.3 billion. Shares of Simon Property, his principal holding, have zoomed higher since, perhaps pushing the value of his fortune past $2 billion.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • you need to take the one third sit your self down somewhere
    I think mrs.Bren,is wrong keeping the information from David and Cynthia Simon.They have alrigth know what going on with there father estate,the reason they didnt join with Mrs.Debroah because David and Cynthia have there own business to run.somebody need tell her that god dont like ugly.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT