IBJNews

Katz Sapper caught up in Simon estate battle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Carmel accounting firm that has handled work for Simon family members and their companies for decades has become ensnared in the legal battle over Mel Simon’s fortune.

At a court hearing Friday morning in Hamilton County, Katz Sapper & Miller objected to subpoenas it received in February from Melvin’s daughter Deborah, saying the information requested was far too broad.

The search terms included in the subpoenas would yield more than 160,000 pages of tax documents, information that then would have to be reviewed to protect confidential information, said Richard Dick, an attorney for Katz Sapper and its KSM Business Services unit.

The requests also would force the firm to review every work station for deleted files and review archived data stored on computer tapes. Reviewing a single month of tapes would take 39 hours, Dick said.

“It is way beyond anything that could be considered reasonable,” Dick told Judge William Hughes.

Deborah in January sued Melvin’s widow, Bren Simon, contesting changes to Mel's estate plan he signed in March 2009, seven months before his death at age 82. The revisions substantially increased the share of his fortune earmarked for Bren.

The two sides have brawled over nearly every aspect of the case since. During Friday’s hearing, Jack Hittle, an attorney for Deborah, agreed to exclude the backed up data. But he said producing the tax records was not overly burdensome, especially considering all the profits Simon work has generated for the firm over the years.

“They are a sophisticated outfit,” Hittle said. “They should be able to produce these documents.”

Katz Sapper had estimated that producing and reviewing the 160,000 pages of tax records would cost the firm $100,000, and going through the backed up records might add $70,000 in expense.

Judge Hughes did not rule during the hearing, but indicated he likely would require Deborah to pay and require she provide $100,000 to the court clerk as security.

The legal battle has been awkward for Katz Sapper. In addition to handling financial affairs for Melvin and Bren, the firm has done work for Deborah and her brother, David, CEO of Simon Property Group. Further, one of the witnesses to the signing of the estate plan now being challenged was Bruce Jacobson, a retired Katz Sapper partner.

Deborah contends her father was suffering from dementia and didn’t understand what he was doing when he revised the plan, boosting the share of his fortune going directly to Bren from one-third to one-half. Bren, 67, who had been married to Melvin since 1972, contends the changes fully reflected his wishes.

Melvin Simon was one of Indiana’s richest men. Forbes magazine in March 2009 estimated his net worth at $1.3 billion. Shares of Simon Property, his principal holding, have zoomed higher since, perhaps pushing the value of his fortune past $2 billion.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Charities will suffer
    The money will not go to civic commitments if Bren wins-- it will be put on hold for years till her death and charities will lose money they counted on from the Simons- Mel & Bren. She is doing a 180 turn once Mel died- not being civic anymore. Give the disputed amount directly to charities- then good organizations and hurting people win.
  • Be Real and the charities will suffer
    The articles indicate that a lot of the money was set up to go to charities originally and on a schedule to begin right after his death. If Bren wins, the money will not go to the charities automatically till after her death, which could be in 10-20 years, or even longer- with all those charities suffering during that time. She was also giving more money in the "new will" to her daughter from a previous marriage, and that is at the expense of Mel's "blood children" and his grandchildren from them, too. Does not seem right--and Herb Simon would know if his brother wanted to change those details as they were always pretty close in business. But you do not see herb's name mentioned nor has he been subpoenaed. Hope this ends peacefully, as Mel did so much for his communities here in central Indiana.
  • Who wins!
    The lawyers and accountants are the only REAL winners in cases like these!
  • golddugger
    Bren,

    Dont be greedy your husband has the money sit up for the charities,Why are you makeing these people waiting? what so bad one of the charities set up for your son. you remine me the late mrs. helmsley.I cant believe you bull husband change the will that is so low I hope you can live with your self.
  • Exactly
    That is exactly what Deborah and David want is that their father and the benefactor to many charities should have his wishes granted and certainly the children should not be redacted out of a Will by a Greedy Widow....
  • Can they really spend it all?
    These types of cases always sound so frustrating to those of us who know that no matter who wins -- they can't spend it all?!? Perhaps, the civic commitment demonstrated by Mrs. Simon and her late husband should be honored and used as an example for the children :)!!!!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

    2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

    3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

    4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

    5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

    ADVERTISEMENT