IBJNews

Katz Sapper caught up in Simon estate battle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Carmel accounting firm that has handled work for Simon family members and their companies for decades has become ensnared in the legal battle over Mel Simon’s fortune.

At a court hearing Friday morning in Hamilton County, Katz Sapper & Miller objected to subpoenas it received in February from Melvin’s daughter Deborah, saying the information requested was far too broad.

The search terms included in the subpoenas would yield more than 160,000 pages of tax documents, information that then would have to be reviewed to protect confidential information, said Richard Dick, an attorney for Katz Sapper and its KSM Business Services unit.

The requests also would force the firm to review every work station for deleted files and review archived data stored on computer tapes. Reviewing a single month of tapes would take 39 hours, Dick said.

“It is way beyond anything that could be considered reasonable,” Dick told Judge William Hughes.

Deborah in January sued Melvin’s widow, Bren Simon, contesting changes to Mel's estate plan he signed in March 2009, seven months before his death at age 82. The revisions substantially increased the share of his fortune earmarked for Bren.

The two sides have brawled over nearly every aspect of the case since. During Friday’s hearing, Jack Hittle, an attorney for Deborah, agreed to exclude the backed up data. But he said producing the tax records was not overly burdensome, especially considering all the profits Simon work has generated for the firm over the years.

“They are a sophisticated outfit,” Hittle said. “They should be able to produce these documents.”

Katz Sapper had estimated that producing and reviewing the 160,000 pages of tax records would cost the firm $100,000, and going through the backed up records might add $70,000 in expense.

Judge Hughes did not rule during the hearing, but indicated he likely would require Deborah to pay and require she provide $100,000 to the court clerk as security.

The legal battle has been awkward for Katz Sapper. In addition to handling financial affairs for Melvin and Bren, the firm has done work for Deborah and her brother, David, CEO of Simon Property Group. Further, one of the witnesses to the signing of the estate plan now being challenged was Bruce Jacobson, a retired Katz Sapper partner.

Deborah contends her father was suffering from dementia and didn’t understand what he was doing when he revised the plan, boosting the share of his fortune going directly to Bren from one-third to one-half. Bren, 67, who had been married to Melvin since 1972, contends the changes fully reflected his wishes.

Melvin Simon was one of Indiana’s richest men. Forbes magazine in March 2009 estimated his net worth at $1.3 billion. Shares of Simon Property, his principal holding, have zoomed higher since, perhaps pushing the value of his fortune past $2 billion.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Charities will suffer
    The money will not go to civic commitments if Bren wins-- it will be put on hold for years till her death and charities will lose money they counted on from the Simons- Mel & Bren. She is doing a 180 turn once Mel died- not being civic anymore. Give the disputed amount directly to charities- then good organizations and hurting people win.
  • Be Real and the charities will suffer
    The articles indicate that a lot of the money was set up to go to charities originally and on a schedule to begin right after his death. If Bren wins, the money will not go to the charities automatically till after her death, which could be in 10-20 years, or even longer- with all those charities suffering during that time. She was also giving more money in the "new will" to her daughter from a previous marriage, and that is at the expense of Mel's "blood children" and his grandchildren from them, too. Does not seem right--and Herb Simon would know if his brother wanted to change those details as they were always pretty close in business. But you do not see herb's name mentioned nor has he been subpoenaed. Hope this ends peacefully, as Mel did so much for his communities here in central Indiana.
  • Who wins!
    The lawyers and accountants are the only REAL winners in cases like these!
  • golddugger
    Bren,

    Dont be greedy your husband has the money sit up for the charities,Why are you makeing these people waiting? what so bad one of the charities set up for your son. you remine me the late mrs. helmsley.I cant believe you bull husband change the will that is so low I hope you can live with your self.
  • Exactly
    That is exactly what Deborah and David want is that their father and the benefactor to many charities should have his wishes granted and certainly the children should not be redacted out of a Will by a Greedy Widow....
  • Can they really spend it all?
    These types of cases always sound so frustrating to those of us who know that no matter who wins -- they can't spend it all?!? Perhaps, the civic commitment demonstrated by Mrs. Simon and her late husband should be honored and used as an example for the children :)!!!!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

    2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

    3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

    4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

    5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

    ADVERTISEMENT