IBJNews

Kentucky governor: Casino gambling bill coming soon

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A long-awaited proposal to open Kentucky to casino gambling could be introduced in the state's Senate within days.

Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear said Wednesday he has reached an agreement with state Sen. Damon Thayer, R-Georgetown, on the wording of a proposed constitutional amendment. Thayer, who supports casino-style gambling as a means to generate revenue for Kentucky's thoroughbred industry, will sponsor the measure in the Republican-controlled Senate.

"We will spend the next few days laying the groundwork for its introduction," Beshear said in a statement. "We are hopeful that our senators will give this bill the full consideration it deserves, since repeated polls show that Kentuckians are demanding an opportunity to vote on this issue."

Beshear has been pushing for years to allow Kentuckians to wager on more than horse races in the Bible-belt state. He wants to lift the constitutional ban on casinos in hopes of keeping money in Kentucky that is now being gambled in neighboring states, like Indiana.

If lawmakers approve a constitutional amendment, it would be placed on the ballot for voters to ratify or reject in November.

Martin Cothran, spokesman for The Family Foundation, said he believes the measure will ultimately fail.

"Support for the gambling legislation is collapsing faster than a 10-dollar tent in a hurricane," Cothran said in a statement. "They didn't have the votes to begin with, and now what little support they have is deteriorating by the day."

Gambling proponents have been at odds over whether to propose a simple constitutional amendment or to describe precisely how many casinos would open and where.

"I think a lot of people are just fed up with the infighting and lack of action and want to move on to other things," Cothran said.

Beshear's gambling push has been complicated by a bitter partisan fight over legislative redistricting. He had said in December that he was confident a bill would be filed during the first week of January.

The state's horse industry, hoping to cash in on casino gambling, wants to use some of the proceeds from gambling to increase racing purses at Kentucky tracks to draw more horses into the state.

Sen. Tom Buford, R-Nicholasville, said gambling proponents have been weighing differing proposals. One would call for two free-standing casinos and four to be tied to existing horse tracks. Another would be more general, designating no particular number of casinos or locations for them.

The gambling issue has lingered since Beshear's 2007 gubernatorial campaign. He ran on the promise to expand gambling opportunities in the state but so far has been unable to fulfill that promise. He was re-elected this year in a campaign that included the same gambling pledge.

The governor insists that Kentucky is losing hundreds of millions of dollars to neighboring states that allow casino-style gambling. He said Kentucky could recapture some of that money for needs within its borders by offering the same kinds of gambling here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  2. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

  3. If Whole Foods went in, I doubt the Nora one would stay open, and with all those customers coming to Broad Ripple traffic would be horrible, and forget about a run to the grocery on weekend nights. I think concern over the number of apartments is misplaced, but the 400 space parking garage has me concerned - someone needs to ask the developer just how much traffic they think this development is going to generate. I am not against more neighborhood residents, but heavy commercial traffic going in and out at that location sounds like a mess.

  4. I thought everyone was innocent until guilt was proven. Seems people have already convicted Reggie in the press. My nephew was a good kid and is a good man, more to this story im sure

  5. Going by the Marion County population only is of little use. 13th largest? No Way! To judge the real size of a metro area, the easy way is to look at the Arbitron rating list. Indianapolis hovers around 40th largest in the nation--sometimes more, sometimes less. Advertisers want to know exactly how large the population is before they buy radio advertising. Arbitron figured it out long ago. Indianapolis is estimated at 1,427,500. The real #13 is Seattle-Tacoma with a metro population of 3,470,400. So, the population of just Marion County is completely irrelevant to anything useful as far as metro area planning.

ADVERTISEMENT