IBJNews

Key symphony fundraising campaign far exceeded goal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra said Thursday that it far exceeded its $5 million goal for a fundraising campaign that helped lock in a long-term contract for the ISO's musicians.

The campaign raised a total of $8.5 million, the organization revealed, thanks to a large number of major gifts.

Terms of an October bridge agreement with the musicians' union required the ISO to raise $5 million from new donors by Feb. 3 in order for the performers to move to their long-term contracts. Meeting the ambitious goal required the ISO to raise almost as much in three months as it typically raises in a year. The deal ended a month-long lockout that delayed the start of the season.

The ISO announced on Sunday that it had met the goal, but didn't provide final fundraising figures.

New donors ended up contributing $5.4 million, while existing donors gave another $3.1 million, the ISO said Thursday.

Major donors to the campaign included:

— Colts owner Jim Irsay, $750,000;

— Pacers owner Herb Simon, $750,000;

— Former Long Electric CEO Yvonne Shaheen, $500,000;

— Marti Ripberger, $500,000;

— Paul Harris Stores co-founder Gerald Paul, wife Dorit Paul and daughter Eloise Paul, $420,000;

— The Care Institute, $250,000;

— ChaCha CEO Scott Jones, $100,000;

— The Buckingham Foundation, $100,000;

— National Wine & Spirits CEO James LaCrosse, $100,000;

— Five anonymous donors, $1.15 million.

The ISO received increased annual contributions, but did not include them in the total, from:

— Ruth Lilly Philanthropic Foundation, $250,000;

— Sarah and John Lechleiter, $125,000;

— Joe and Charlene Barnette, $100,000.

The ISO also will receive $2 million from the Lilly Endowment because it reached its goal before its Feb. 3 deadline. The grant will pay for new seats in Hilbert Circle Theatre and the marketing costs of recruiting new donors for the symphony.

Historically, the group only raises about $6.5 million in a year. The organization launched the 10-week push for $5 million as a way to kick off much more ambitious long-term fundraising strategies as part of sweeping changes to its business model.

ISO executives have cut into the budget—including $11.5 million in concessions from the musicians’ union over the next five years—as a way to cap its draws from its diminishing endowment. The group took more than $11 million from the fund last fiscal year, which was a 13-percent draw—well beyond the typical recommended rate of 5 percent or less.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Missing the Lede
    The real headline should be that the "Symphony Fell $91.5 million short of fundraising goal." in light of their original plan to raise $100M. $750K from billionaires who rake in many times that each year from taxpayers? Pathetic.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT