IBJNews

Kite Realty improves third-quarter results

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Kite Realty Group Trust improved its financial performance in the third quarter, reporting funds from operations of $7.8 million, up from $2.8 million in the same period last year despite a slight dip in revenue.

Funds from operations, or FFO, is a common performance measure used by real estate investment trusts.

Kite’s results of 11 cents per share met analysts’ expectations.

Total revenue for the quarter ended Sept. 30 was $25.2 million, down from $25.7 million a year ago, the developer said Wednesday, attributing the decline to lower construction activity during the quarter.

The company had a net loss of $2.4 million for the third quarter of 2010, an improvement from the $3.4 million loss reported in the prior-year period, when Kite took a $5.4 million charge to write off the value of a Dallas strip center.

CEO John A. Kite said the company’s leasing activity also is picking up. Occupancy in its 51 retail centers was 92 percent, up from 91 percent in the previous quarter.

“These strong leasing efforts will be reflected in improved revenue generation in future quarters,” Kite said in a prepared statement.

Kite signed or renewed 42 leases in the third quarter totaling 349,200 square feet—including the Container Store and BuyBuy Baby, which signed on to join Nordstrom Rack as part of the redevelopment of Rivers Edge shopping center in Indianapolis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT