IBJNews

Language Training Center expands relationship with LPGA

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis-based Language Training Center has expanded its relationship with the LPGA and is now translating the letters of the professional golf association’s commissioner into multiple languages and providing live, “UN-style” interpretation at association meetings.

Language Training Center started working with the LPGA last year to help teach its players—who hail from 29 countries—various foreign languages. As IBJ reported in December, the LPGA signed up for LTC’s services for the next two years.

LTC’s staff of 15 and subcontractor team of 85 can collectively speak more than 100 languages. President Martin George and some of his staff taught languages to 30 players last year, traveling with them on the tour and conferencing with them over Skype.

LPGA officials want golfers on the circuit to mix with sponsors and the media and to speak as much English as possible. Also, some native English-speakers on the tour might open up international sponsorship opportunities by learning to speak other languages.

The LPGA will play tournaments in 13 nations this year.

“Our organizations both share the belief that understanding and embracing cultures and languages is an essential attribute for individuals working and competing in the global community,” said David Higdon, chief communications officer of the LPGA, in a prepared statement. “LPGA players and staff have responded positively to the LTC programs, and we see substantial growth ahead in this partnership.”

LTC helped American player Vicky Hurst learn Korean and helped Spanish rookie Beatriz Recari learn Japanese. Under the extended partnership, the Language Training Center will also conduct cross-cultural seminars for LPGA players and staff

“This may feel like an LPGA [initiative], but it’s really a business [initiative],” LPGA Commissioner Michael Whan told IBJ in December. “I don’t really consider it a language program. I consider it a cross-culture program.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT