IBJNews

Language Training Center expands relationship with LPGA

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis-based Language Training Center has expanded its relationship with the LPGA and is now translating the letters of the professional golf association’s commissioner into multiple languages and providing live, “UN-style” interpretation at association meetings.

Language Training Center started working with the LPGA last year to help teach its players—who hail from 29 countries—various foreign languages. As IBJ reported in December, the LPGA signed up for LTC’s services for the next two years.

LTC’s staff of 15 and subcontractor team of 85 can collectively speak more than 100 languages. President Martin George and some of his staff taught languages to 30 players last year, traveling with them on the tour and conferencing with them over Skype.

LPGA officials want golfers on the circuit to mix with sponsors and the media and to speak as much English as possible. Also, some native English-speakers on the tour might open up international sponsorship opportunities by learning to speak other languages.

The LPGA will play tournaments in 13 nations this year.

“Our organizations both share the belief that understanding and embracing cultures and languages is an essential attribute for individuals working and competing in the global community,” said David Higdon, chief communications officer of the LPGA, in a prepared statement. “LPGA players and staff have responded positively to the LTC programs, and we see substantial growth ahead in this partnership.”

LTC helped American player Vicky Hurst learn Korean and helped Spanish rookie Beatriz Recari learn Japanese. Under the extended partnership, the Language Training Center will also conduct cross-cultural seminars for LPGA players and staff

“This may feel like an LPGA [initiative], but it’s really a business [initiative],” LPGA Commissioner Michael Whan told IBJ in December. “I don’t really consider it a language program. I consider it a cross-culture program.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT