Last-minute lobbying kills nursing home moratorium

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A leading proponent of a moratorium on nursing-home construction said last-minute lobbying and big promises about jobs and investment killed the bill.

“The experience illustrates how quickly things can change behind closed doors,” said Rep. Ed Clere, R-New Albany, on Friday morning.

The Indiana House late Thursday night approved House Bill 1391, which during conference committee negotiations replaced Senate Bill 173 as the primary vehicle for a nursing home moratorium. The version of HB 1391 that finally went to the House, however, was stripped of any moratorium language because there wasn’t enough support in the House Republican caucus, Clere said.

The turn of events is surprising, considering SB 173, which proposed a five-year moratorium, passed the Senate, and a watered-down version with a one-year moratorium passed the House, 55-40. A compromise version with two-year ban appeared ready for passage on Tuesday.

Opponents of the moratorium stepped up their lobbying effort while lawmakers were negotiating over different versions of the final bill. Clere said former House Speaker Michael Phillips, now a lobbyist, and his son Jeff Phillips were engaged by the opposition earlier this week. Afterward, he said, “The support just simply collapsed. It was an implosion. It was a striking change of course.”

Clere acknowledged that the long-term care industry, which advocated for the moratorium, had its share of lobbyists working on the issue. “There was a legion of lobbyists on each side,” he said.

The Indiana Health Care Association and others in the long-term care industry argued that the moratorium was needed to cut nursing-home vacancy rates and ensure better care for Medicaid patients. Opponents, which included a construction-industry coalition, said the ban was only protecting established industry players and violated free-market principals.

The coalition was led by Mainstreet Property Group, whose CEO, Zeke Turner, is the son of Rep. Eric Turner, R-Cicero. Before the House voted on SB 173 in February, Mainstreet announced that it would build 24 more nursing homes in Indiana and create 3,000 jobs if the moratorium didn’t pass.

There’s no way of knowing whether Mainstreet’s promise will be fulfilled, said Clere, chairman of the House Public Health Committee. “The policy discussion took a back seat to promises of big investment,” he said.

A Mainstreet spokesperson was not immediately available for comment.

In its final version, without the moratorium, HB 1391 makes changes to the Community and Home Options for Institutional Care of the Elderly and Disabled program.


  • best option
    Since everything these days is profit driven and focuses on the owner-investor instead of the consumer, it seems to me that the best option for a healthy happy old age is to stay out of nursing homes if at all possible. That may not be the way it goes for some, and some may really need to be in a nursing home, but a goal to strive for should be to stay independent as long as possible. I know it's my hope and I am taking actions now to better ensure my hope will be reality.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.