IBJNews

Lauth Group leads slide in commercial real estate

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review

The outlook for commercial real estate development continued to worsen in 2009, as one major name faltered and other companies scrambled to redesign their business models and capitalize on the carnage.

Each of the city’s major development firms shed employees as demand and financing for speculative projects disappeared. Simon Property Group Inc. CEO David Simon went so far as to say, in a conference call with Wall Street analysts, that new retail developments are “dead for a decade.”

The most prominent local victim of the downturn was Lauth Group Inc., the once-mighty developer of more than $3 billion in projects. The company filed several subsidiaries for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May. Company officials blamed the impatience of a major lender, Chicago-based Inland American Real Estate Trust, for the filing.

But the company, which grew rapidly to keep pace with an insatiable demand for new office, industrial and retail developments, simply could not go on once the projects dried up. Lauth started 2008 with about 450 employees but had fewer than 50 late in 2009, as the company’s principals sought to renegotiate with lenders and emerge from bankruptcy protection as a mostly property-management-oriented company.

Few commercial property owners had any equity left in their buildings, let alone enough to meet the higher thresholds banks were demanding. And funding from commercial mortgage-backed securities—a $1 trillion funding source just three years ago—had disappeared entirely. With so many commercial properties under water, real estate players in 2009 began positioning themselves to take advantage of what they saw as an inevitable shakeout.

Those seemingly best positioned to take advantage of the downturn included real estate investment trusts such as Simon that had access to public capital. Simon in December agreed to acquire Prime Outlets in a $2.3 billion deal and was setting itself up for a possible bid for its largest U.S. competitor, Chicago-based General Growth Properties.

Meanwhile, smaller local development firms had to find other ways to bring in revenue as they waited out the market. Condo and retail developer Kosene & Kosene, for one, opened a residential brokerage operation.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT