IBJNews

Election panel chair's law firm donated to White

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The state elections panel that is weighing voter fraud allegations against Indiana Secretary of State Charlie White includes a Republican loosely linked to White through political contributions, raising questions about the panel's impartiality as it prepares to rule on whether White should remain in office.

Indiana Recount Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler is listed among top-name Republicans as a participant in a White fundraiser in May 2009. A political action committee set up by Wheeler's law firm, Frost Brown Todd, donated $5,000 to White's election campaign in July 2010, according to state campaign finance records. The law firm itself donated another $2,000 that year, the records show.

The firm's PAC also donated $2,000 to Democrat Vop Osili, according to the campaign database.

Mike Murphy, a spokesman for Frost Brown Todd, disputed the state's figures, saying it double-counted contributions from the law firm and that the PAC donated only $2,500 to White and $1,000 to Osili.

Regardless of the amount, Common Cause Indiana policy director Julia Vaughn said the donations raise questions about whether the Republican-led commission, which is under a judge's order to consider Democrats' challenge to White's election, can be neutral.

"It certainly creates a cloud of impropriety," said Vaughn, whose not-for-profit group advocates for election reform.

Democrats accuse White of using his ex-wife's address on his voter registration form to keep his Fishers Town Council seat even though he bought a condo with his fiancée outside the district he represented. They want the recount panel to find that White violated the law when he voted in last year's May primary under his ex-wife's address and install Osili as secretary of state.

White also faces an August trial on charges including voter fraud and perjury. A conviction on any of the seven criminal counts against him would be enough to oust him from office and possibly put him in jail.

Wheeler was listed along with roughly a dozen other top Republicans — including Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, then-Sen. Teresa Lubbers, R-Indianapolis, and Dee Dee Benkie, one of the state's representatives on the Republican National Committee — on a Facebook invitation to a "kickoff" fundraiser for White's campaign on May 13, 2009, at Indiana Republican Party Headquarters in Indianapolis.

Wheeler said he did not attend the White fundraiser and made no direct contributions to White.

"I did not attend that, I was in New York City at the time. Not sure how my name got onto a Facebook invite. I don't do Facebook," Wheeler wrote in an e-mail Monday to The Associated Press.

Murphy said contributions from the firm's PAC are made on behalf of all employees at the firm.

White said Monday he did not remember whether Wheeler attended the sparsely attended fundraiser.

The three-member recount commission has two Republican members and one Democrat. The other Republican, Gordon Durnil, has given $50 each to two separate Republicans, not including White, according to the state's campaign finance database.

The lone Democrat on the panel, Bernard "Buddy" Pylitt, gave $150 to the state Democratic Party in 2004, according to the state database.

Pylitt said Monday he did not believe that donation to the plaintiffs in this case would sway his decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT