IBJNews

Law firm sticks with unconventional space

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The concept of the fixer-upper is well known in residential real estate, but a local law firm is employing the same concept in the commercial office space realm. With its expansion last month into the historic Eden-Talbott House at 1336 N. Delaware St., the local environmental law firm Plews Shadley Racher & Braun now owns and occupies three historic homes and a 1950s-era office building in the same block.

The firm’s 55 employees are distributed between those four buildings and a nearby fifth building where it leases 1,000 square feet. The piecemeal headquarters, which totals 30,000 square feet and was assembled over the last 21 years, puts the firm in rare company. It’s almost unheard of for an organization of its size to conduct business out of five separate buildings.

And in today’s market, office users are more likely to rent space than own it.

It’s definitely a tenant’s market, said Jon Owens, a senior vice president with the local office of Colliers Turley Martin Tucker. With office vacancy rates topping 19 percent, landlords are cutting attractive deals.

A few years ago, when vacancies were relatively low and landlords were calling the shots, a wave of law firms turned to the market for buildings they could buy and occupy. That’s rare today, Owens said, but it still happens. Decision-makers in a firm don’t always follow the crowd.

That’s certainly true at Plews, where the partners prefer to own rather than lease and are proud of the firm’s support of historic preservation, said Jeffrey Featherstun, a partner in the firm.

“We like to think we’ve improved the neighborhood,” Featherstun said.

The firm was founded with three partners in 1988, the same year it bought the Italian Renaissance-style house at 1346 N. Delaware known as the William B. Wheelock House. Wheelock, an executive of the former L.S. Ayres & Co. department store, built the house in 1912.

By 1994, Plews needed more space and bought the 1892 Alvin S. Lockard House across the street. By early 2000 it had purchased a small office building in the same block, and at the end of last year the firm bought the Eden-Talbott House.

The 1871 house had a variety of owners before Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana bought it in 1979 to spur redevelopment of the Old Northside. Plews bought the house from the National Federation of Music Clubs and hired Marten Construction Management to renovate the nearly 8,000-square-foot structure.
Featherstun said the firm’s 17 partners are distributed about evenly between the five buildings, two of which are on the east side of Delaware. The other three are across the street.

Employees have gotten used to the unconventional office arrangement. “More business is transacted electronically on bad-weather days,” said Featherstun, but “we keep umbrellas by the door.” The flip side is that on good-weather days, employees have a good excuse to get some fresh air, he said.

Featherstun, who’s been with Plews since 1992, said the firm reexamines its real estate needs every time it runs out of space and regularly hears from real estate brokers interested in getting the firm under one roof. But clients, guests and employees enjoy the unique set-up, he said, and the partners haven’t been persuaded to give it up.

They also think they’ve gotten the buildings at the right price. “Our hope is that if we ever decide to do something different we can sell the houses for a nice profit.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT