IBJNews

Lawmakers brace for health law, potential costs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana lawmakers can add confusion over the federal health insurance law to their already overflowing plate when they return for their 2013 legislative session in January.

If it wasn't an issue in Indiana's 2012 Statehouse races, it quickly became an issue for the victors when President Barack Obama was re-elected, dashing any hopes of repealing the measure and leaving states with an immediate deadline for answering how they would build the exchanges through which residents will buy insurance plans.

Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma punctuated its importance last week when he tapped the top health policy expert in his caucus to run the House's most powerful committee next session. State Rep. Tim Brown, a Crawfordsville physician, will move from his post atop the House public health committee to run the budget-writing House Ways and Means Committee.

"With so much of the state's focus not only currently, but in the next several years, being on health care and health care-related initiatives including the affordable care act -- which many hoped would be just a fond memory after Nov. 6 -- it's clear that the role of health care is taking an increasing role in the Ways and Means Committee," Bosma said in introducing Brown.

Governor-elect Mike Pence answered an immediate question last week when he said Indiana would not run its own exchange and effectively shut the door on running an exchange in cooperation with the federal government. But he has until Feb. 16 to actually close that door.

Pence's antipathy to the federal health care law is well-known and has been starkly put before. Last summer, he compared the Supreme Court ruling affirming the law to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in a closed-door meeting of congressional Republicans. He later apologized for the remark.

But even some of the nation's most conservative governors, including Wisconsin's Scott Walker and Florida's Rick Scott, have warmed to the idea of building a hybrid exchange in partnership with the federal government.

A bigger question may stand for lawmakers tasked with writing the budget: Will Indiana expand its Medicaid roles via the federal law? The Supreme Court struck down a provision of the law requiring that states accept additional residents into the federal program.

Indiana's Medicaid actuary, the group providing detailed analysis for Gov. Mitch Daniels' administration, tagged the cost of doing nothing at $612 million combined over seven years based on an assumed "woodwork effect": poor residents are driven out of the "woodwork" by the individual mandate to seek Medicaid coverage and other residents are dropped from their employers' health care plans.

Milliman, the state's actuary, estimated that a full expansion of Medicaid would cost the state $2.6 billion over that same time.

Former Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson, a Bloomington Democrat, questioned the validity of the report, noting that it leaves out estimated savings from spreading risk across a greater pool of insured residents -- the key concept Democrats have argued would "bend the cost curve" of unmitigated health insurance premium spikes in the last decade or so.

"What we really need are cost estimates from a third party that's unassociated with, or independent of the state, in order to get real numbers," said Simpson, who studied the federal law before running with Democrat John Gregg against Pence.

But any increase in spending is likely to ruffle lawmakers eyeing another two years of austere growth in tax collections matched with increasing demands from state agencies and universities that tightened their belts in recent years.

And questions about the actual cost of the law are met with even more questions from confounded lawmakers who say they can't get a straight response from the federal government.

"I don't know if the General Assembly is ready to take any action," said Sen. Pat Miller, chairwoman of the Senate's health committee. "If we could get some of our questions answered, I could tell you."

Some of lawmakers' key concerns, Miller said, deal with the level of coverage from any plan and details like whether adult and children's dental visits will be paid for.

As the questions continue to swirl, one thing is clear: Indiana's lawmakers are bracing for something big. They're just not sure exactly what yet.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Socialism
    Here it comes. All the hidden laws and fines will cost the middle class more than anyone else. Nobama is a joke and so is his health care plan. But as mentioned in the other note, this is what this socialist, lazy, un-educated, free loading majority wanted. We will never have a conservative president again due to about four or five sub-cultures. If I mention each of them on here my note will not be published. You all know who you are, and I wish like hell you all would have just moved to Europe rather than screwing up this country, and taken hollywood with you. I have friends that are from European countries that came here because it was better. Now, they are going back because it is the SAME. Oh, you might want to check to see if your company has to follow the new healthcare plan. Nobama picks and choses who has to adhere to his stupid new laws and who does not. For example, Wal-mart does not. If your company did not contribute to the thiefs re-election, your company probably has to carry some expensive plan that will ultimately cause them to close thus LOOSING more jobs.
  • Obama Care!
    Well, this is what the majority of the country wanted. Here it is! Let's enjoy what they've done for us! (What they have done is insured that we will all pay higher taxes, if we are lucky enough to be working and, if we are those rich and lucky who also PAY for their own health care, they have also guaranteed us higher costs out of our pockets.) I just can't wait. It makes me wish I hadn't worked my *ss off for the last 30 years and had cruised along and could just jump up and claim what I'm ENTITLED to. Rich people like me, who work nearly 60 hours a week to be middle class. Should feel lucky to pay higher taxes and health care premiums to insure all of these people who just "can't seem to work". PUKE! Sorry, I miss the America I grew up in. The capitalist one! Pilgrims, where can we go to build a free society where working people get to keep what they earn and lazy people get to starve!????!!!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT