Lawmakers debate education standards, testing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New “college and career-ready” assessments will gradually replace ISTEP over the next three school years, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Glenda Ritz said Tuesday at a legislative study committee meeting.

But whether those assessments will be based on the controversial Common Core standards, Indiana’s own standards or a hybrid of both is still unclear.

“We do need to have standards in place when we start the (2014-15) school year,” Ritz told the Study Committee on Common Core Education Standards. “Assessments cannot be determined until the standards are determined.”

The committee spent the afternoon taking testimony about Common Core – a set of K-12 school standards created by a group of state education officials and endorsed by President Barack Obama’s administration – and tools that could be used to test whether students are meeting those standards.

The committee’s work is part of a larger effort to determine whether Indiana should stick with Common Core, which it adopted in 2010 and has already implemented in kindergarten and first grade. But earlier this year, the Republican-controlled General Assembly voted to pause implementation of Common Core to conduct a multifaceted study of the standards. That study includes work by the legislative committee, the education department, the State Board of Education and other officials.

For years, Indiana has created and implemented its own standards – which have generally received high marks from groups reviewing them – and have tested student achievement using the ISTEP test.

But as more states are moving to Common Core, they are also looking for new assessment tools that are based on the standards. The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers – which is a consortium of 19 states, including Indiana – is developing one such assessment.

However, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence and Ritz moved in July to remove Indiana from the governing board of the group, in part because the state is reassessing whether to use the standards.

On Tuesday, Bob Bickerton, who serves on the PARCC board and is the senior associate commissioner at the Massachusetts Department of Education, said Hoosiers have been essential in helping to develop the PARCC assessment system. But he said it’s understandable that officials in Indiana and Massachusetts – which he said already had strong education standards – would have to think harder about adopting Common Core than other places that had weaker standards.

Still, he told the legislative study committee that officials in Massachusetts ultimately decided that Common Core and the PARCC assessments were “the best choice for our state” and its students.

“And in a state with scant natural resources other than our human capital, our future depends on it,” he said.

Ritz outlined for lawmakers timeline for education officials to make decisions on Common Core or another standards. Advisory teams consisting of parents and education experts from around the state have been developed to give feedback to state standards committees, which will give monthly updates to the state Board of Education.

The state board will also host several public hearings on the issue next spring.

Meanwhile, drafts of state standards will be presented to the Indiana Education Roundtable beginning in January and continuing through February so that group can make recommendations to the state board, which will make the final decision.

Ritz said her goal is to adopt a set of state standards by April so schools can have the standards in place by next fall – and the assessments can be adopted.

“We have (an) opportunity here to set it right,” she said.

Rather than a using a pass/fail system to assess students, Ritz wants to adopt what she called an adaptive assessment that would indicate the grade level at which students perform.  Each time a student answers a question correctly, an adaptive assessment would ask more difficult questions. Conversely, when a student gives the wrong answer, the questions would get easier.

Ritz said she believes an adaptive system could measure student growth and teacher effectiveness at the same time.

“I am all about strong accountability,” Ritz said. “In fact, I’m all about student accountability.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.