IBJNews

Lawsuit: Anderson mayor fired 10 workers over politics

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A central Indiana mayor is fighting a lawsuit filed by 10 former city employees who claim they lost their jobs because they backed his opponent in last year's election.

The federal lawsuit filed by the former Anderson employees against Republican Mayor Kevin Smith argues that their dismissal by the city violated their rights to political activities, The Herald Bulletin reported Friday.

The lawsuit said the workers all publicly supported then-Mayor Kris Ockomon, a Democrat, in the 2011 election and that three of them are Democratic precinct committee representatives.

City attorney Jason Childers denied that the workers had been wrongly terminated. He said he wouldn't give specifics on each case, but that the city could dismiss workers in confidential or policy-making positions or for performance reasons.

"We feel we have valid legally supported reasons for doing what we did," Childers said. "We are confident it will come out that way in court."

Smith returned to the mayor's office in January after winning the November election rematch with Ockomon, who had unseated Smith in the 2007 election.

The lawsuit said the workers involved include a woman who had been the city's utility manager. In mid-December she took a job as a cashier because she was told she would be fired after working for the city for more than 10 years.

Others include the building superintendent for city hall and other facilities who had worked for the city for 24 years and a 33-year street supervisor/dispatcher for the city transportation system.

"Kevin Smith was responsible for the termination of all the plaintiffs because they opposed his election as mayor," the lawsuit said. "Plaintiffs were fired because of their political activities, which were protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution."

The lawsuit said all the workers met or exceeded job expectations and that none of them held policy-making positions in the 56,000-person city about 25 miles northeast of Indianapolis.

Another federal suit was filed in mid-March on behalf of two other former employees claiming "retaliatory and unconstitutional discharge" from their jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • BS
    Chris, That is just wrong. The workers of any government are not political pawns. We used to have a system that let politicians hire cronies to government jobs and it was even more corrupt than it is now where they award contracts to the cronies. But I guess if you are rethuglican it is all good when your party denies someone the right to free speech?
  • at will
    are we an at will state? Thought so. Look this is the risk you take working for govt. The benefit is that the job is super easy. You have to purge government because there are too many people that started out great but sat down on the job.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT