IBJNews

Lilly agrees to pay up to $1.2B for diabetes drugs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. agreed to pay up to $1.2 billion for 50 percent rights to two diabetes drugs developed by Germany-based Boehringer Ingelheim, including one on the cusp of market approval.

In exchange, Boehringer Ingelheim agreed to pay up to $650 million for 50 percent rights to two experimental insulins in Lilly’s pipeline, and it could buy rights to a third diabetes drug for another $525 million.

The five-drug deal, announced Tuesday morning, is a way for Lilly to have a shot at new sales quickly. In November it entered a three-year period in which U.S. and European patents will expire on five of its bestselling drugs, sapping roughly half Lilly's total revenue.

"Working together, we will comprise one of the most robust diabetes pipelines in the pharmaceutical industry,” John Lechleieter, CEO of Indianapolis-based Lilly, said in a statement. “For Lilly, this alliance expands our range of offerings for people with diabetes, strengthens our diabetes care capabilities and offers the prospect of near-term revenue opportunities as we address the upcoming loss of patent exclusivity for several of our products."

The leading diabetes drug developed by Boehringer Ingelheim, which has a research and development facility outside Columbus, Ohio, is called linagliptin. It’s an oral pill for Type 2 diabetics and is currently being reviewed by regulators in the United States, Europe and Japan.

The sales potential of linagliptin isn’t clear, as Boehringer is a closely held company. If approved, linagliptin would join a growing class of drugs, known as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, which analysts project could grow to $7 billion in global sales by 2015.

However, there are already two similar drugs on the market—Januvia, made by New Jersey-based Merck & Co. Inc., and Onglyza, made by U.K.-based AstraZeneca plc and New York-based Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

Linagliptin is one of four other drugs being developed by drug companies in the same class.

"The big challenge will be that by the time linagliptin comes to the market, prescribers will have four to five years of experience with Januvia," Klaus Dugi, Boehringer’s head of medical affairs, told Bloomberg News in October 2009. "It will be an uphill battle to convince them of the benefits of linagliptin."

On the upside, linagliptin does not require a kidney test to determine the proper dose for a patient—a convenience factor that could give it an advantage over its competitors.

Boehringer’s other drug in the deal is also an oral diabetes pill, BI10773, which is in Phase 3 clinical trials.

Lilly contributed two experimental insulins: LY2605541 and LY2963016, which are expected to begin Phase 3 trials this year. Boehringer also could buy partial rights to a biotech drug in Phase 2 testing.

Lilly and Boehringer have worked together in the past on drugs, most notably the European rights to Cymbalta, an antidepressant that is Lilly’s No. 2 selling drug now. In August, Lilly paid $400 million to buy back those rights from Boehringer.

Because of the deal, Lilly will record a $300 million charge, or 27 cents per share. The company said it would factor the charge into its 2011 profit forecast, which it will issue on Jan. 27.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT